<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic second-level interface group in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/second-level-interface-group/m-p/117813#M8316</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer NetWork Managment Guide, second level interface group - "You can create a second-level interface group by using two multimode interface groups".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could it create first two port with lacp, and second one port with single model, and then create second level interface group combine before two group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp first -b ip e0b e0a&lt;BR /&gt;ifgrp create single second e0d&lt;BR /&gt;ifgrp create single Secondlevel first second&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chung&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chinchillaking</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:35:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>second-level interface group</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/second-level-interface-group/m-p/117813#M8316</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer NetWork Managment Guide, second level interface group - "You can create a second-level interface group by using two multimode interface groups".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could it create first two port with lacp, and second one port with single model, and then create second level interface group combine before two group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp first -b ip e0b e0a&lt;BR /&gt;ifgrp create single second e0d&lt;BR /&gt;ifgrp create single Secondlevel first second&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chung&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/second-level-interface-group/m-p/117813#M8316</guid>
      <dc:creator>chinchillaking</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: second-level interface group</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/second-level-interface-group/m-p/117821#M8317</link>
      <description>Yes, that's possible, but there is no real reason to have second VIF at all - you can just as well have single mode VIF between multi mode VIF and physical interface.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 05:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/second-level-interface-group/m-p/117821#M8317</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-01T05:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

