<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/122412#M8495</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;seeing as most the tech support are clueless with performance analysis I will help the OP out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Run this command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;statistics show-periodic -object disk:raid_group -instance /node1_aggr1/plex0/rg0&amp;nbsp; -counter read_ops|write_ops -interval 1 -iterations 60&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you will need to be in Priveleged Mode - Advanced.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From there you can work out your read/write % and actually work out how to fix it, DO NOT Involve netapp support - they will read off a script and ask for a perfstat then a week later they will say "buy more disk" rather than, oh you have high latency? maybe you need to re-balance the aggregate? or reallocate or add jumbo frames or anything constructive lol.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Juzdizzlerizler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-18T00:57:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18459#M7372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for the calculation to find out the maximum IOPS that a Disk shelf&amp;nbsp; can provide , Raid type is RAID-DP .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) &lt;STRONG&gt;is it just Number of disk X IOPS per disk &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should not be right ?&amp;nbsp; we have to consider write penalty for parity and also the Shelf Loop has a limitation of bandwidth (2G/4G)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) &lt;STRONG&gt;How&amp;nbsp; Size of IO and Type of IO play their part ..&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example :&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If we consider&amp;nbsp; 50% Read and 50% write IOPS, how much IOPS we will get , and how its is calculated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) &lt;STRONG&gt;How latency play its part in the calculation&lt;/STRONG&gt; .....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am searching a deatiled&amp;nbsp; calculation that consider these all matrix and provide the IOPS that a Shelf offer ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do netapp explains these calclulation somewhere , Any Doc will be gr8 help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advanced&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bipul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18459#M7372</guid>
      <dc:creator>bipul34_gogoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T20:19:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18464#M7373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also interested in same information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will good if someone post answer for this Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18464#M7373</guid>
      <dc:creator>irotbarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T13:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18469#M7374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are two ways you can approach this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) NetApp sizers dealing with different applications / workloads (e.g. Oracle, Exchange, SQL, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) rule of thumb sizing, based on average number of IOPS per disk / spindle&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second approach assumes all IOPS are random with the majority of reads. Typical 'rough' figures I've seen are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 180-200 IOPS per 15k spindle&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 60-80 IOPS per SATA spindle&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(you exclude parity &amp;amp; hot spare drives from calculations)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:12:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18469#M7374</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T20:12:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18473#M7375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bipul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wrote a article about this subject with how 3140 and 3160 latency levels compare and also how to calculate the theoretical maximum IOps based on type and quantity of hard disk in a RAID-DP based aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://darrylcauldwell.com/netapp-fas-iop-theorectical-maximum-workload-aggregate-load-balancing/" title="http://darrylcauldwell.com/netapp-fas-iop-theorectical-maximum-workload-aggregate-load-balancing/" target="_blank"&gt;http://darrylcauldwell.com/netapp-fas-iop-theorectical-maximum-workload-aggregate-load-balancing/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Darryl&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/18473#M7375</guid>
      <dc:creator>dcauldwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-27T08:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/101313#M7595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I Just came across this calculation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raw IOPS = Disk Speed IOPS * Number of disks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Functional IOPS = (Raw IOPS * Write % / RAID Penalty) + (RAW IOPS * Read %)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note :- For Raid 6 write penalty is 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/101313#M7595</guid>
      <dc:creator>aselvan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-03T12:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/119596#M8394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's sounds good. How to find Write % &amp;amp; Read %?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 04:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/119596#M8394</guid>
      <dc:creator>VM-NA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-25T04:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum IOPS  for a RAID-DP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/122412#M8495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;seeing as most the tech support are clueless with performance analysis I will help the OP out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Run this command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;statistics show-periodic -object disk:raid_group -instance /node1_aggr1/plex0/rg0&amp;nbsp; -counter read_ops|write_ops -interval 1 -iterations 60&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you will need to be in Priveleged Mode - Advanced.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From there you can work out your read/write % and actually work out how to fix it, DO NOT Involve netapp support - they will read off a script and ask for a perfstat then a week later they will say "buy more disk" rather than, oh you have high latency? maybe you need to re-balance the aggregate? or reallocate or add jumbo frames or anything constructive lol.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Maximum-IOPS-for-a-RAID-DP/m-p/122412#M8495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juzdizzlerizler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-18T00:57:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

