<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lacp vs multi-mode in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Lacp-vs-multi-mode/m-p/124251#M8533</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i've read posts about the comparison between static &lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/lacp-vs-multi-mode/td-p/7480" target="_self"&gt;multimode and lacp&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and i'd like to know how to test the advantage of LACP in our environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please help me to identify whether the method below will work?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.I connect two 10G ports of the netapp 8060 with two n5k switches&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.In static multimode move the port from the switch to a unconfigured port&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.Then the data ontap cannot detect the link is abnormal&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4.Change the mode to lacp and then also move the&amp;nbsp;the port from the switch to a unconfigured port&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5.I will see the data ontap can detect the link is down&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you think this method will work, or is there any better method?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jacry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:37:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lacp vs multi-mode</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Lacp-vs-multi-mode/m-p/124251#M8533</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i've read posts about the comparison between static &lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/lacp-vs-multi-mode/td-p/7480" target="_self"&gt;multimode and lacp&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and i'd like to know how to test the advantage of LACP in our environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please help me to identify whether the method below will work?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.I connect two 10G ports of the netapp 8060 with two n5k switches&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.In static multimode move the port from the switch to a unconfigured port&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.Then the data ontap cannot detect the link is abnormal&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4.Change the mode to lacp and then also move the&amp;nbsp;the port from the switch to a unconfigured port&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5.I will see the data ontap can detect the link is down&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you think this method will work, or is there any better method?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Lacp-vs-multi-mode/m-p/124251#M8533</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jacry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:37:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

