<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SVM running CIFS with multiple LIFS in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132398#M8806</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an SVM acting as a file server on our domain running CIFS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has been configured with multiple LIFS on different subnets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's occasionally complaining that it can't connect via LDAP to the Domain Controlllers even though one of the LIFS is on the same subnet as the DCs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is which LIF will it use to contact the DCs...any of them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andyberry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:54:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SVM running CIFS with multiple LIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132398#M8806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an SVM acting as a file server on our domain running CIFS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has been configured with multiple LIFS on different subnets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's occasionally complaining that it can't connect via LDAP to the Domain Controlllers even though one of the LIFS is on the same subnet as the DCs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is which LIF will it use to contact the DCs...any of them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132398#M8806</guid>
      <dc:creator>andyberry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:54:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SVM running CIFS with multiple LIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132401#M8807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;any cifs data lif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000kU5QAI/what-lif-roles-does-clustered-data-ontap-use-to-establish-connections-to-remote-servers?language=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000kU5QAI/what-lif-roles-does-clustered-data-ontap-use-to-establish-connections-to-remote-servers?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132401#M8807</guid>
      <dc:creator>skneo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T08:33:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SVM running CIFS with multiple LIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132404#M8808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to the TR-4182 doc it could also be the SVMs management LIF&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7374iC26FC2DF32283AAE/image-size/medium?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Capture.PNG" title="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But is there any logic in how it decides which order to try and connect to DCs fo instance it's not clear whether it trys the management LIF first?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are we saying that I need to ensure all of the LIFS can talk to the DCs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132404#M8808</guid>
      <dc:creator>andyberry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T09:01:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SVM running CIFS with multiple LIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132406#M8809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i think it&amp;nbsp;should be&amp;nbsp;normal routing table. as example&amp;nbsp;we have lifs on subnets without ad comunication and use local account or guest for this special usecase.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have no issues on the other&amp;nbsp;cifs lifs&amp;nbsp;there on normal active directory site. But we only habe a configured gateway on data and mngt lif.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/SVM-running-CIFS-with-multiple-LIFS/m-p/132406#M8809</guid>
      <dc:creator>skneo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T09:23:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

