<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CIFS - several small volumes or 1 large volume? in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9407#M885</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to have different snapshot retention times for different directories you need to separate them to different volumes. I.e. have user homedirs with retention times of 4 weeks and group directories with 8 weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-22T08:59:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CIFS - several small volumes or 1 large volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9384#M882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm moving 2 file servers with about 3TB of files each to a FAS2040. In setting up the volumes for CIFS I was wondering if I should create 1 large 6TB volume for all the folders from the servers or should I separate them into 6-10 volumes based on the folders. How would each of these scenarios affect snapshots, file restores, etc? How would dedupe work in either of these scenarios. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9384#M882</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuck_hou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS - several small volumes or 1 large volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9390#M883</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chuck,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; De-dupe is at the volume level, so if you have mass redundancy in that 3TB, all in one is better for de-dupe.&amp;nbsp; However, 3TB of files in a single volume presents problems for backup, and potentially DR. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If there is a lot of dedupe, you may want to use a volume snapmirror to replicate to any DR, because you get de-duped snapmirror transfers on VSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you are doing NDMP backups, you need to have multiple qtrees at a minimum and backup at the qtree level.&amp;nbsp; The more files to backup the longer and slower it will go, even with direct attached tape drives.&amp;nbsp; Inodes are the biggest factor with NDMP backup from what I have seen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly think about where you are going to create your shares....trying to search through 6TB of files from a single volume level share would be problematic at best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9390#M883</guid>
      <dc:creator>columbus_admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T19:56:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS - several small volumes or 1 large volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9399#M884</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The max volume size for an asis volume on a FAS2040 with Data ONTAP 7.3 is 3TB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the Storage Management Guide in Data ONTAP Documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott's other points are all very valid.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might want to keep the same shares you have now, and configure nbalias' on the filer so your users don't have to re-map shares...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eugene Kashpureff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9399#M884</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T22:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS - several small volumes or 1 large volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9407#M885</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to have different snapshot retention times for different directories you need to separate them to different volumes. I.e. have user homedirs with retention times of 4 weeks and group directories with 8 weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-several-small-volumes-or-1-large-volume/m-p/9407#M885</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-22T08:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

