<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VIF not reachable after takeover in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/984#M94</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you check this ...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;options dns.enable off&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you change this to&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;options dns.enable on&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;and check.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VKALVEMULA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-04T14:27:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/957#M88</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a FAS 3240 being initialized. I have created two vifs on head one and two using the onboard e0a and e0b on each controller. I have configured two vlans on each controller vif and set them up to be partners to each other. The problem I am having is that when I do a manual takeover, the vlan interfaces from the failed controller are not reachable after the takeover. I can ping the partner addresses on the controller taking over but I cant from any clients on the network. Can anyone explain this behavior? This is an initial setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hostname host1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp vif1FCoE -b ip e1b e1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp vifh1cifs -b ip e0b e0a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vlan create vifh1cifs 32 34&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vif1FCoE `hostname`-vif1FCoE netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vif2FCoE mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig e0M `hostname`-e0M netmask 255.255.255.0 mtusize 1500 trusted wins mediatype 100tx-fd flowcontrol full up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vifh1cifs-34 `hostname`-vifh1cifs-34 netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vifh2cifs-34 mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vifh1cifs-32 `hostname`-vifh1cifs-32 netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vifh2cifs-32 mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route add default 10.237.34.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;routed on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;options dns.enable off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;options nis.enable off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;savecore&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hostname host2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp vif2FCoE -b ip e1a e1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create lacp vifh2cifs -b ip e0a e0b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vlan create vifh2cifs 32 34&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vif2FCoE `hostname`-vif2FCoE netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vif1FCoE mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig e0M `hostname`-e0M netmask 255.255.255.0 mtusize 1500 trusted wins mediatype 100tx-fd flowcontrol full up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vifh2cifs-32 `hostname`-vifh2cifs-32 netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vifh1cifs-32 mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifconfig vifh2cifs-34 `hostname`-vifh2cifs-34 netmask 255.255.255.0 partner vifh1cifs-34 mtusize 1500 trusted wins up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route add default 10.237.34 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;routed on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;options dns.enable off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;options nis.enable off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;savecore&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/957#M88</guid>
      <dc:creator>FRANKLUNA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/962#M89</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds like a switch configuration. Ontap is failing the interfaces over. Is the switch config not allowing 2 ips or macs from the same port?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/962#M89</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T03:03:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/967#M90</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cant imagine this is the case since each controller is connected using 2 uplink ports in a LACP trunk on e0a and e0b and it passes traffic (two vlans) until it is failed over. Im really not sure what to think of this. Ive had 4 Netapp level one guys tell me my RC config looks fine. Maybe this a default route issue. I have e0M on a seperate subnet as the e0A and e0B interfaces. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/967#M90</guid>
      <dc:creator>FRANKLUNA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T03:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/971#M91</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Routing is possible. But should be the same on failover. Does "partner netstat -rn" how the routes?  Does "partner ping gatewayIP" work? You can trace route too in ontap. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone 4S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/971#M91</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T03:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/976#M92</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rc looks good to me too. I did run into an issue at a customer where they didn't allow more than one mac address per port and that restriction caused an issue. May not be the case here but worth checking. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/976#M92</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T03:39:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/980#M93</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ill have to give this a try tomorrow morning, its just frustrating when nothing seems out of place. We have used two switches so far and they both have had the same problem. The default route is the network that one of the vlan interfaces is on so Im not sure why during failover at least one would not work. Im stumped at this point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/980#M93</guid>
      <dc:creator>FRANKLUNA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T03:43:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/984#M94</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you check this ...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;options dns.enable off&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you change this to&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;options dns.enable on&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;and check.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/984#M94</guid>
      <dc:creator>VKALVEMULA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T14:27:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/988#M95</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the 3240 on a bench isolated, I am cabled in. I have also enabled dns before but it didn't help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/988#M95</guid>
      <dc:creator>FRANKLUNA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:12:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF not reachable after takeover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/993#M96</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;check under your /etc/hosts file&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does both the filers have VIF IP address details &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IP add(x.x.x.x)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VIF1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IP add(x.x.x.x)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; VIF2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when filer reboots or takeover make sure you have all the VIF details in /etc/hosts file so that it can read and enable the appropiate VIFs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i had the same issue after reboot as yours.. so &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;once i added the ip add and vif details under /etc/hosts.. all the VIFs were automatically onlien and enable after my 2nd test takeover and giveback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/VIF-not-reachable-after-takeover/m-p/993#M96</guid>
      <dc:creator>VKALVEMULA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-25T16:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

