<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inconsistent LACP system ID in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435958#M9731</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see ... I had been looking at this sideways ... thank you!&amp;nbsp; Works now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--sk&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skendric</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-15T17:58:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistent LACP system ID</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435767#M9725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PROBLEM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am configuring (4) NICs on a two-node AF200 9.9.1P6 cluster with LACP, to attach to a pair of Cisco switches (configured with vPC)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The (2) Cisco switches are emitting identical LACP System IDs, which is good&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* Both Cisco switches:&amp;nbsp; 00-23-04-EE-BE-D1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But each of the ONTAP nodes are emitting different LACP System IDs, which is bad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* On Node 1, system ID = 02-A0-98-D7-EE-08&lt;BR /&gt;* On Node 2, system ID = 02-A0-98-D7-F3-01&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CONFIGURE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created the ifgrp as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0b -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -port e0d&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0b -port e0d&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -port e0f&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0b -port e0f&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ontap-n1::&amp;gt; network port show -ifgrp-port a0b&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Node: ontap-n1&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Speed(Mbps) Health&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;e0d Default - up 1500 1000/10000 healthy&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;e0f Default - up 1500 1000/10000 healthy&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Node: ontap-n2&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Speed(Mbps) Health&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;--------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- --------&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;e0d Default - up 1500 auto/10000 healthy&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;e0f Default - up 1500 auto/10000 healthy&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;4 entries were displayed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;ontap-n1::&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IFCONFIG -V OUTPUT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;Node 1: ontap-n1&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;a0b: flags=8843&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; metric 0 mtu 1500&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;laggport: e0f flags=1c&amp;lt;ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING&amp;gt; state=3d&amp;lt;ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[(8000,02-A0-98-D7-EE-08,0032,8000,0007),&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;(7F9B,00-23-04-EE-BE-D1,8005,8000,0121)]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input/output LACPDUs: 189 / 145043&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;laggport: e0d flags=1c&amp;lt;ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING&amp;gt; state=3d&amp;lt;ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[(8000,02-A0-98-D7-EE-08,0032,8000,0009),&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;(7F9B,00-23-04-EE-BE-D1,8005,8000,4109)]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input/output LACPDUs: 218 / 145072&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Node 2: ontap-n2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;a0b: flags=8843&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST&amp;gt; metric 0 mtu 1500&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[...]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;laggport: e0f flags=0&amp;lt;&amp;gt; state=d&amp;lt;ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[(8000,02-A0-98-D7-F3-01,0032,8000,0007),&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;(7F9B,00-23-04-EE-BE-D1,8005,8000,0125)]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;input/output LACPDUs: 124 / 144983&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;laggport: e0d flags=0&amp;lt;&amp;gt; state=d&amp;lt;ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;[(8000,02-A0-98-D7-F3-01,0032,8000,0009),&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;(7F9B,00-23-04-EE-BE-D1,8005,8000,410A)]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am referring to the following KB article to interpret ifconfig output: &lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/How_to_Troubleshoot_LACP_Issues_with_ifconfig_-v_in_ONTAP_9.2?mt-view=f1" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/How_to_Troubleshoot_LACP_Issues_with_ifconfig_-v_in_ONTAP_9.2?mt-view=f1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QUESTION&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What am I missing here?&amp;nbsp; Is there something about the 'ifgrp' creation that I have forgotten?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--sk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stuart Kendrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:59:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435767#M9725</guid>
      <dc:creator>skendric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T09:59:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent LACP system ID</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435911#M9727</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is expected behaviour. It is necessary to create a channel group to each controller, and then ONTAP will take care of moving IPs between nodes during failover or in case both links to a controller fail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435911#M9727</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-14T19:18:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent LACP system ID</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435915#M9729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems to me though that I have done precisely that:&amp;nbsp; I have a created an LACP channel (a0b) and then assigned (4) links to it (two from each controller).&amp;nbsp; I want to present to the switches a single LACP System Identifier + Key, so that they perceive the ONTAP cluster as a single entity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you suggesting that I want (2) channel-groups, each containing (1) port from each controller?&amp;nbsp; e.g. something like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0b -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0c -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp create -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0c -distr-func ip -mode multimode_lacp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -port e0d&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0c -port e0d&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n1 -ifgrp a0b -port e0f&lt;BR /&gt;network port ifgrp add-port -node ontap-n2 -ifgrp a0c -port e0f&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--sk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435915#M9729</guid>
      <dc:creator>skendric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-14T21:40:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent LACP system ID</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435916#M9730</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, your first setup was correct for the NetApp controller side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the cisco side, you need to create two channel groups, one per NetApp controller, each with two ports - one port from each of the cisco switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One final piece of advice is that if you plan to carry the VLAN used for the OOB management port SP + e0M over the port channel, it should be the native VLAN&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 23:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435916#M9730</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-14T23:15:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent LACP system ID</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435958#M9731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see ... I had been looking at this sideways ... thank you!&amp;nbsp; Works now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--sk&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Inconsistent-LACP-system-ID/m-p/435958#M9731</guid>
      <dc:creator>skendric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-15T17:58:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

