<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic More on provisioned usable capacity in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/More-on-provisioned-usable-capacity/m-p/52728#M10982</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We recently upgraded from SANscreen 5 to 6, and in version 6 I&amp;nbsp; believe the IBM XIV reporting has been "fixed".&amp;nbsp; When an IBM XIV reports 1 GB, it is decimal (i.e. 1000 MB per GB, 1000 KB per MB, etc).&amp;nbsp; In version 5 of SANscreen it would report it as reported by the XIV.&amp;nbsp; In version 6 it appears to (correctly) change this to binary (i.e. 1024 MB per GB).&amp;nbsp; This is great, but it has caused a huge dip in my provisioned capacity report.&amp;nbsp; Hosts that SANscreen used to think had 1098 GB now correctly show as 1024 GB. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way for me to fix the old data in my reporting?&amp;nbsp; If I drop the DB and build from history will that fix it, or will it just re-acquire the bad data from SANscreen for pre v6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sam&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>salalonde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>More on provisioned usable capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/More-on-provisioned-usable-capacity/m-p/52728#M10982</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We recently upgraded from SANscreen 5 to 6, and in version 6 I&amp;nbsp; believe the IBM XIV reporting has been "fixed".&amp;nbsp; When an IBM XIV reports 1 GB, it is decimal (i.e. 1000 MB per GB, 1000 KB per MB, etc).&amp;nbsp; In version 5 of SANscreen it would report it as reported by the XIV.&amp;nbsp; In version 6 it appears to (correctly) change this to binary (i.e. 1024 MB per GB).&amp;nbsp; This is great, but it has caused a huge dip in my provisioned capacity report.&amp;nbsp; Hosts that SANscreen used to think had 1098 GB now correctly show as 1024 GB. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way for me to fix the old data in my reporting?&amp;nbsp; If I drop the DB and build from history will that fix it, or will it just re-acquire the bad data from SANscreen for pre v6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sam&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/More-on-provisioned-usable-capacity/m-p/52728#M10982</guid>
      <dc:creator>salalonde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More on provisioned usable capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/More-on-provisioned-usable-capacity/m-p/52733#M10983</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rebuilding the db will just re-acquire the old data. There isn't a way today to manipulate old data as is in SANscreen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Potential options - filter the report so it only looks at recent data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create a variant of the report with a filter that only looks at old data, and tweak it to attempt to adjust for the data (i.e, multiply values by (1000&lt;SUP&gt;3/1024&lt;/SUP&gt;3 or somesuch)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/More-on-provisioned-usable-capacity/m-p/52733#M10983</guid>
      <dc:creator>ostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-29T16:52:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

