<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OnCommand Core or OnCommand Report for single site? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OnCommand-Core-or-OnCommand-Report-for-single-site/m-p/57337#M11896</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Charles,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OnCommand Report can be still beneficial, for example if you want to create some custom dashboard comparing capacity available and used in different physical locations; all in one screen as charts. The benefit in a single OnCommand core environment is more on the kind of reporting you need and how much you want to customize to suite your reporting needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, Does the current OnCommand core reporting feature satisfy all your reporting needs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>araman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-25T11:02:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OnCommand Core or OnCommand Report for single site?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OnCommand-Core-or-OnCommand-Report-for-single-site/m-p/57332#M11895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have deployed OnCommand Core and used groups to seperate physical locations (DataCenter vs Remote Office, Which DC, etc). Since I have a single OnCommand Core (DFM 5.0 basically) is there a need or benefit of deploying an OnCommand Report server? There's not a lot of (clear) documentation on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OnCommand-Core-or-OnCommand-Report-for-single-site/m-p/57332#M11895</guid>
      <dc:creator>charlesadams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:36:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OnCommand Core or OnCommand Report for single site?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OnCommand-Core-or-OnCommand-Report-for-single-site/m-p/57337#M11896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Charles,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OnCommand Report can be still beneficial, for example if you want to create some custom dashboard comparing capacity available and used in different physical locations; all in one screen as charts. The benefit in a single OnCommand core environment is more on the kind of reporting you need and how much you want to customize to suite your reporting needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, Does the current OnCommand core reporting feature satisfy all your reporting needs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OnCommand-Core-or-OnCommand-Report-for-single-site/m-p/57337#M11896</guid>
      <dc:creator>araman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-25T11:02:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

