<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Managing multiple controllers in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58836#M12207</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is everyone managing more than one controller? Logging into 3+ controllers is a bit inefficient.&amp;nbsp; It is also confusing as it makes it appear that one controller "owns" a shelf when if clustered both controllers have access. For example, I log onto toaster1 and see a list of volumes.&amp;nbsp; I then log onto toaster2 (second controller) and it has a different set of volumes.&amp;nbsp; Both toasters are connected to the same shelves - shouldn't they see all volumes via Filerview? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ttrulis01</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:16:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Managing multiple controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58836#M12207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is everyone managing more than one controller? Logging into 3+ controllers is a bit inefficient.&amp;nbsp; It is also confusing as it makes it appear that one controller "owns" a shelf when if clustered both controllers have access. For example, I log onto toaster1 and see a list of volumes.&amp;nbsp; I then log onto toaster2 (second controller) and it has a different set of volumes.&amp;nbsp; Both toasters are connected to the same shelves - shouldn't they see all volumes via Filerview? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58836#M12207</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttrulis01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:16:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Managing multiple controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58840#M12210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In windows environment use system manager. You can dowload it free from now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have more than 5 system maybe you choose Operations Manager (Solaris, Linux, Windows).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OM (formerly DFM) need additional license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58840#M12210</guid>
      <dc:creator>jayadratha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-23T14:58:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Managing multiple controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58849#M12217</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Re clustered pair:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each controller should be 'cabled up' to all disks, but this is for fail-over purposes only. At any given time each disk in your setup can be 'owned' by one controller only, hence separate disk pools, aggregates &amp;amp; volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, both controllers work independently &amp;amp; have to be managed independently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58849#M12217</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-23T15:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Managing multiple controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58855#M12222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Point of note as on Operations Manager 3.8 and above its only available for Linux and Windows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're primarily a Windows shop then system manager should suffice for managing a few systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You're question indicates that cabling implies ownership of disk.  Cabling is there are part of the clustering configuration to take ownership of the partners disk in the event of a controller failure.  The disks are assigned to a given controller such that during normal operations a controller only has access to the volumes on the disks it owns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58855#M12222</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardSopp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-23T19:25:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Managing multiple controllers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58860#M12225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Absolutely spot on answer by Radek re. how the volumes show up. A bit on Systems Manager, FilerView and Operations Manager though....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FilerView is for your day to day management and can be annoying in that you have to login to FilerView on each system individually (even two systems in a cluster). System Manager is the long-term replacement for FilerView (i.e. does day to day tasks) and one of its benefits in being Windows MMC-based is that you can add all your systems into a single pane of glass. You still management them separately but it's all in the same window basically (and with a nicer UI + wizards in some cases). There are a few features not in System Manager yet (mainly SnapMirror and stuff around RAID groups) but it's quite good for a 1.1 release....free for download at NOW of course.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operations Manager is not as much a day to day management tool as for long-term history/trending and alerting. It also has a component called Performance Advisor that helps with very in-depth performance troubleshooting (can see latencies, ops, individual volume, LUN, aggregate or even disk activity levels in real time). Operations Manager used to be a paid add-on but is now included in the Base Pack with all new purchases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:52:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Managing-multiple-controllers/m-p/58860#M12225</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-18T21:52:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

