<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ptotection Manager - Dataset in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Ptotection-Manager-Dataset/m-p/65879#M13684</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a questions regarding Creating and managing Datasets in Protection manager:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Do we have any guidelines when creating datasets, situation is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; * We have few Hundreds of filers and Windows server, taking backup using snapvault and OSSV.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; * Planning to put things on Protection manager for data protection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** How we shall name the Datasets, so that it is easy to identify the resources within it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** Do we have any common interface which can list resources within the Dataset, something like a tree view or dataset explorer or anything which can do the job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Complication here is we cannot create individual dataset for each windows server or each Volume from the Filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason is each dataset will use one destination and that cannot be used for other dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks to me like a one to one relation, one destination volume can protect only dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest the best possible way to handle this situation,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sheel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sheelnidhig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:56:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ptotection Manager - Dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Ptotection-Manager-Dataset/m-p/65879#M13684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a questions regarding Creating and managing Datasets in Protection manager:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Do we have any guidelines when creating datasets, situation is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; * We have few Hundreds of filers and Windows server, taking backup using snapvault and OSSV.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; * Planning to put things on Protection manager for data protection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** How we shall name the Datasets, so that it is easy to identify the resources within it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** Do we have any common interface which can list resources within the Dataset, something like a tree view or dataset explorer or anything which can do the job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Complication here is we cannot create individual dataset for each windows server or each Volume from the Filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason is each dataset will use one destination and that cannot be used for other dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks to me like a one to one relation, one destination volume can protect only dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest the best possible way to handle this situation,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sheel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Ptotection-Manager-Dataset/m-p/65879#M13684</guid>
      <dc:creator>sheelnidhig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:56:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ptotection Manager - Dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Ptotection-Manager-Dataset/m-p/65883#M13685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Sheel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My strong recommendation for creation of datasets is to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Group what you plan on putting in&amp;nbsp; them based on the policy you are&amp;nbsp; going to apply to the set... i.e. if you are talking specifically about OSSV, consider the frequency of the updates, and how long you are going to keep the backups.&amp;nbsp; that schedule and retention pretty much define the policy.&amp;nbsp; if you have 2 or 3 variations regarding SLA's. then that's the first logical dataset divider. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Group based upon network load balancing.&amp;nbsp; Once you ahve established SLA driven differences that provide a list of what would go into the dataset, then you can make a determination based on scheduled updates.&amp;nbsp; If you have 250 OSSV hosts, 100 in dataset A, 100 in dataset B, and 50 in dataset C, you may want to break dataset A into smaller datasets, and offest the scheduled update times so that it balances the network load, timing them so that as one update completes, the next is starting up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. You can also group based on destination...&amp;nbsp; It's not a true one dataset to one destination relationship scenario.&amp;nbsp; a dataset can have dozend of VSM relationships in it, or it can have a single snapvault.&amp;nbsp; Provisioning manager prefers to create a single volume per OSSV dataset, and then creates qtrees under it for the actual backup paths on the hosts.&amp;nbsp; Filer snapvault creates more of a volume to volume ratio, then makes qtrees within on the destination.&amp;nbsp; Based on that, and whether you have 8.x on your destination, you might break up the OSSV jobs around how big you anticipate them getting, or creating a single volume oin a 64bit aggregate, and pointing all of your datasets manually at it as a secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clear as mud.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Ptotection-Manager-Dataset/m-p/65883#M13685</guid>
      <dc:creator>mschlaerth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-18T20:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

