<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 &amp;quot;Enterprise Edition&amp;quot; recommendation in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66506#M13830</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am only speculating... I am going to assume that it is just what has been tested.&amp;nbsp; For what it's worth, I run WFA on my Windows 8 system with no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SeanLuce</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-28T21:12:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66502#M13829</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just noticed that WFA 2.1 install guide states the EE Enterprise Edition is "recommended". We're installing it on a Standard Edition and haven't seen problems so far but wondering why EE is recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66502#M13829</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:44:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66506#M13830</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am only speculating... I am going to assume that it is just what has been tested.&amp;nbsp; For what it's worth, I run WFA on my Windows 8 system with no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66506#M13830</guid>
      <dc:creator>SeanLuce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-28T21:12:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66511#M13832</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To add to Sean's response, yes, typically what's officially recommended is based on what has been tested and confirmed internally.&amp;nbsp; I'm honestly not aware of the various platforms leveraged for the QA &amp;amp; Validation processes, but I can tell you I've run WFA on a variety of flavors of Windows over the years.&amp;nbsp; Windows XP*, Windows 7* 32bit &amp;amp; 64bit, Windows Server 2003*, Windows Server 2008*.&amp;nbsp; I'm now using Windows Server 2012* VMs, and WFA is working just fine.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I WILL say that I DO hope that the QA folks start standing up some Windows Server 2012 VMs soon, so they can recommend both a Windows 2008 AND a Windows 2012 configuration for future versions of WFA.&amp;nbsp; Many of our customers have already moved or will soon be moving to a flavor of Windows Sever 2012.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66511#M13832</guid>
      <dc:creator>hill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-30T17:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66516#M13834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QA team is tetsing with Windows 2008 and Windows 2012 too. We have not seen issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configurations are also listed in IMT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sharaf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 04:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66516#M13834</guid>
      <dc:creator>sharaf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-31T04:11:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66521#M13835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sharaf,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reminder that we should all be checking the &lt;A href="http://support.netapp.com/matrix/" target="_blank"&gt;Interoperability Matrix Tool (IMT)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66521#M13835</guid>
      <dc:creator>hill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-04T00:08:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How important is WFA's Windows 2008 "Enterprise Edition" recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66523#M13836</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As far as I researched and found, there is not much difference in installing WFA on Standard or Enterprise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did some google search and found this as the difference between S &amp;amp; E edition of W2k8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/OS%20Spec%20STDvENT_FINAL.pdf" title="http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/OS%20Spec%20STDvENT_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/OS%20Spec%20STDvENT_FINAL.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;None of these are used in WFA that make a difference in using standard vs enterprise version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:26:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-important-is-WFA-s-Windows-2008-quot-Enterprise-Edition-quot-recommendation/m-p/66523#M13836</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-07T11:26:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

