<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: performance metrics in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67176#M13991</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, we do not cache Performance Advisor information. Yet, that is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking at several different angles to caching performance info (So you'd be able to use a finder on that).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some include Performance Advisor and others include different tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment there was no "stronge" requirement for caching performance issue, but we are exploring solutions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as we are fairly certain that we will get one soon enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-07T11:22:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67158#M13988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I want to create a Finder that finds arrays where the 95th percentile of CPU utilization or network utilization is less than 50%, how would I go about it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67158#M13988</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67162#M13989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At this point, the performance data is not collected in the DFM Cache.&amp;nbsp; My understanding is that this will be added into an upcoming release but I am not sure when.&amp;nbsp; I am working on a process to create Provisioning Manager resource pools that will be broken into multiple groups based on I/O capabilities and 'level of risk'.&amp;nbsp; The plan is to use Performance Advisor data and some scripting to create the resource pools based on criteria.&amp;nbsp; The pools would be changed on a daily or weekly basis using overall samples.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would definitely not want to use 'current' values as you need to be mindful of the potential to have spikes and drops that could cause incorrect selection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just my two bits....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeremy Goodrum&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67162#M13989</guid>
      <dc:creator>goodrum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-30T19:05:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67171#M13990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jeremy.&amp;nbsp; That's helpful.&amp;nbsp; I agree that I wouldn't want to use "current" values, unless they were the current trends.&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting project you're working on.&amp;nbsp; Please let me know if/when you get it working.&amp;nbsp; I'd be curious to see what you've done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67171#M13990</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-05T16:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67176#M13991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, we do not cache Performance Advisor information. Yet, that is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking at several different angles to caching performance info (So you'd be able to use a finder on that).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some include Performance Advisor and others include different tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment there was no "stronge" requirement for caching performance issue, but we are exploring solutions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as we are fairly certain that we will get one soon enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/performance-metrics/m-p/67176#M13991</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-07T11:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

