<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71044#M14792</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alain,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you would need a SAN license to use this functionality and that license has not been available for many years, nor is it supported any longer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The primary use of the NHA today is to allow OnCommand Unified Manager Core to manage OSSV services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-28T21:03:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71039#M14790</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need clarification on OCUM 5.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at OCUM documentation, I understand that Host Agent is necessary&amp;nbsp; with SnapDrive to manage LUNs from OCUM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Host Agent seems not being maintained since 2009 (version 2.7) and seems not being available in 64 bits ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are having many FC and iSCSI LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapDrive is installed on Windows Systems from W2k3 to w2k8R2 (32 and 64 bits) that use the LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;do we have to install Host Agent on all the windows machines using LUNs ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;do we have to install another software ? (that may replace Host Agent ...) ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;is SnapDrive the only NetApp software necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any clarification will be welcome&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71039#M14790</guid>
      <dc:creator>alain_boyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71044#M14792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alain,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you would need a SAN license to use this functionality and that license has not been available for many years, nor is it supported any longer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The primary use of the NHA today is to allow OnCommand Unified Manager Core to manage OSSV services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71044#M14792</guid>
      <dc:creator>kryan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-28T21:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71051#M14794</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks Kevin for this confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The LUNs (iSCSI) are currently visible in OCUM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, OCUM displays only the total size of the LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How and where OCUM shows the available and/or used space in the LUN ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be we missed something ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71051#M14794</guid>
      <dc:creator>alain_boyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-28T22:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71056#M14795</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no place to see that in Unified Manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;System Manger can display the used space in a LUN as returned via an API call to ONTAP, although I do not believe that it will show the same value as the hosting OS for the LUN due the differences in what ONTAP is tracking for the LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71056#M14795</guid>
      <dc:creator>kryan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-29T15:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71064#M14796</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Kevin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore we will use volumes space thresholds on OCUM and let the application manage the disk space on LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71064#M14796</guid>
      <dc:creator>alain_boyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-29T15:42:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71069#M14797</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also NHA, is not required for managing luns using SnapDrives. Today NHA only serves 2 puroses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For those who have FSRM license, it does host side file stats reporting&amp;nbsp; like file type, owner, size, access etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Else it help in remotely turning on and off the OSSV service from NMC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71069#M14797</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-31T00:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Host Agent still necessary to manage LUNs from OCUM ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71077#M14798</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks Adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-Host-Agent-still-necessary-to-manage-LUNs-from-OCUM/m-p/71077#M14798</guid>
      <dc:creator>alain_boyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-09T07:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

