<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic snapshot size is difference between oncommand and netbackup in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/snapshot-size-is-difference-between-oncommand-and-netbackup/m-p/75106#M15622</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a plan to create backup by SMVI and Netbackup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The target volume is connected to ESX by iSCSI as a datastore, so I made a snapshot via SMVI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My quiestion is , Oncommand System manager shows that snapshot size&amp;nbsp; is 4.83GB &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but on Netbackup much bigger size was written into tape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's big difference, which is correct and how can I estimate for backup of all virtual machines??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;oncommand : 4.83GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;netbackup kilobytes written&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 34040833(=roughly 32GB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>YOKOMATSUMOTO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:38:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>snapshot size is difference between oncommand and netbackup</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/snapshot-size-is-difference-between-oncommand-and-netbackup/m-p/75106#M15622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a plan to create backup by SMVI and Netbackup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The target volume is connected to ESX by iSCSI as a datastore, so I made a snapshot via SMVI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My quiestion is , Oncommand System manager shows that snapshot size&amp;nbsp; is 4.83GB &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but on Netbackup much bigger size was written into tape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's big difference, which is correct and how can I estimate for backup of all virtual machines??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;oncommand : 4.83GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;netbackup kilobytes written&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 34040833(=roughly 32GB)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/snapshot-size-is-difference-between-oncommand-and-netbackup/m-p/75106#M15622</guid>
      <dc:creator>YOKOMATSUMOTO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:38:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: snapshot size is difference between oncommand and netbackup</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/snapshot-size-is-difference-between-oncommand-and-netbackup/m-p/75111#M15623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From NetApp point of view, snapshot size is the amount of unique data, not shared with other snapshots or active file system. But logically every snapshot represents full filesystem image. Depending on how your NetBackup is setup, it may perform full copy, which explains size of tape backup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 05:10:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/snapshot-size-is-difference-between-oncommand-and-netbackup/m-p/75111#M15623</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-02T05:10:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

