<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Volume Snapshot Policy - bug in acquisition? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Volume-Snapshot-Policy-bug-in-acquisition/m-p/75965#M15768</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trying to incorporate current snapshot policy into a workflow, but it is null.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All, I am running 2.2.0.2.4RC1 with OCUM 5.2.0.16214 (5.2RC1) against CDOT 8.2.1RC1 and it looks like the WFA is not acquiring snapshot policy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see the policy attached to volumes on the filer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1::volume&amp;gt; show -fields snapshot-policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vserver&amp;nbsp; volume snapshot-policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------- ------ ---------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1-01 vol0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1a_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1b_srcvol_vault&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; none&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1b_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test1&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test2&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test3&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test4&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test5&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; userdata&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1c_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;11 entries were displayed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, after acquisition, the cm_storage.volume table shows snapshot_policy_id as null - see attached screenshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know if the problem is with OCUM acquisition from the controllers or WFA acquisition from OCUM&amp;nbsp; (don't know how to query for it in OCUM)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone seen this or have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stephen2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:37:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Volume Snapshot Policy - bug in acquisition?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Volume-Snapshot-Policy-bug-in-acquisition/m-p/75965#M15768</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trying to incorporate current snapshot policy into a workflow, but it is null.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All, I am running 2.2.0.2.4RC1 with OCUM 5.2.0.16214 (5.2RC1) against CDOT 8.2.1RC1 and it looks like the WFA is not acquiring snapshot policy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see the policy attached to volumes on the filer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1::volume&amp;gt; show -fields snapshot-policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vserver&amp;nbsp; volume snapshot-policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------- ------ ---------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1-01 vol0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1a_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1b_srcvol_vault&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; none&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1b_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test1&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test2&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test3&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test4&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test5&amp;nbsp; keep-more-snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; userdata&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cdot1c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cdot1c_root&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;11 entries were displayed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, after acquisition, the cm_storage.volume table shows snapshot_policy_id as null - see attached screenshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know if the problem is with OCUM acquisition from the controllers or WFA acquisition from OCUM&amp;nbsp; (don't know how to query for it in OCUM)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone seen this or have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Volume-Snapshot-Policy-bug-in-acquisition/m-p/75965#M15768</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephen2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Volume Snapshot Policy - bug in acquisition?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Volume-Snapshot-Policy-bug-in-acquisition/m-p/75970#M15769</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OCUM 5.2 doesn't monitor the snapshot policy details. I suggest you use OCUM 6.1 to get the same or use the cDOT custom datasource written by mike goddard for snapshot related data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Volume-Snapshot-Policy-bug-in-acquisition/m-p/75970#M15769</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-25T22:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

