<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WFA 2.2 in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76299#M15817</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do anyone know when 2.2 is supposed to be GA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aparker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:38:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76299#M15817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do anyone know when 2.2 is supposed to be GA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76299#M15817</guid>
      <dc:creator>aparker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:38:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76302#M15818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.2GA is expected around June-July 2014.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abhi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 06:40:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76302#M15818</guid>
      <dc:creator>abhit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T06:40:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76307#M15820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A related question is why can't WFA 2.2 Exported Workflows be imported into 2.1? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've upgraded my dev-lab environment to 2.2RC1 and attempted to export/import some workflows into a v2.1 environment but it failed. Is there any chance this was a mistake or is the rule that imports must always come from the same or older WFA version? This could become a major hassle as folks are managing multiple project for multiple customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS: of course I'm only assuming/expecting 2.1 functionality when I import a 2.2 workflow into 2.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76307#M15820</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T15:32:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76311#M15821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share the .dar file ? So that we can look into the cause of failure ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Importing&amp;nbsp; of a .dar file should work across any version of WFA and there is no requirement that it always has to be higher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76311#M15821</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T16:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76315#M15823</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Really, that's good to know. But it doesn't explain my problem.&amp;nbsp; I sent you the dar file as a direct email. The WFA v2.1 error I got is shown in attachment&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/25421_wfa-v21-import-error.png.png" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76315#M15823</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T16:47:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76318#M15825</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adai, ... I tried three more things to see if I could narrow down the problem but no luck:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I attempted a simpler export-2.2/import-2.1 of just a single workflow. As I mentioned, the original dar file I attempted to import was a complete Category and all it's member workflows and their dependencies. I picked one of those 4 workflows and attempted to import just it (and it's dependencies). No luck, same error as above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I attempted to export-2.2/import-2.1 something entirely different (a datasource and dependent dictionary). Got the same error as above doing that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) I attempted to export-2.2/import-2.1 a single workflow which was in my wfa-2.2 environment but hadn't been touched since wfa-2.1. it was built/edited back when I was running wfa-2.1). This wouldn't import into 2.1 either and gave the same error as above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76318#M15825</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T17:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76322#M15827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Dave!! Are they not backward compatible or is it only when you are importing/exporting from 2.2 to 2.1??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76322#M15827</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavila</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-17T13:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA 2.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76325#M15829</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the latest information I have received it seems WFA&amp;nbsp; dis-allows importing .dar files created with higher WFA version numbers. I think it may have always been that way. That is probably the safest and easiest way to ensure what is being imported doesn't have new-unknown-unsupported features. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-2-2/m-p/76325#M15829</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-17T13:49:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

