<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CIFS Shares Missing in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80524#M16738</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using WFA 2.1.0.70.31RC1.&amp;nbsp; When developing a new workflow, I was testing an SQL query and many of my CIFS shares are not represented in the output.&amp;nbsp; My select statement looked like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT share_name as s_name, array_name as a_name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FROM storage.cifs_share, storage.array&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE cifs_share.array_id = array.id&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND array.name = "My.Array.Name"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I view my CIFS shares in DFM, I see 22 shares.&amp;nbsp; When I view them via testing the select statement in WFA I see 12.&amp;nbsp; In the case of one vfiler it is missing all the shares including all the C$ and ETC$ and whatnot.&amp;nbsp; In the case of another vfiler, C$ and its ilk are there, but other shares that have been created are missing.&amp;nbsp; I can't spot any particular pattern, just that a bunch of them are gone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody ever seen this before?&amp;nbsp; Is it a bug that is fixed in a later version?&amp;nbsp; Is it some kind of freak configuration problem?&amp;nbsp; Any help or guidance would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gag_Halfront</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:44:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CIFS Shares Missing</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80524#M16738</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using WFA 2.1.0.70.31RC1.&amp;nbsp; When developing a new workflow, I was testing an SQL query and many of my CIFS shares are not represented in the output.&amp;nbsp; My select statement looked like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT share_name as s_name, array_name as a_name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FROM storage.cifs_share, storage.array&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE cifs_share.array_id = array.id&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND array.name = "My.Array.Name"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I view my CIFS shares in DFM, I see 22 shares.&amp;nbsp; When I view them via testing the select statement in WFA I see 12.&amp;nbsp; In the case of one vfiler it is missing all the shares including all the C$ and ETC$ and whatnot.&amp;nbsp; In the case of another vfiler, C$ and its ilk are there, but other shares that have been created are missing.&amp;nbsp; I can't spot any particular pattern, just that a bunch of them are gone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody ever seen this before?&amp;nbsp; Is it a bug that is fixed in a later version?&amp;nbsp; Is it some kind of freak configuration problem?&amp;nbsp; Any help or guidance would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80524#M16738</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gag_Halfront</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Shares Missing</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80528#M16740</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you make sure you ran acquire now on the datasource before running your query?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The acquire interval is typically 30minutes. This could be because of the delay there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the shares newly created and newly acquired by DFM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Anil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80528#M16740</guid>
      <dc:creator>ag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-04T05:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Shares Missing</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80531#M16742</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If DFM is showing 22 and WFA not showing the same is a problem with WFA, unless the cache acquisition from DFM is not complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW is there a reason why you are still running 2.1 RC when we have 2.1 GA or even for that matter 2.2 RC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80531#M16742</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-04T05:41:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Shares Missing</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80534#M16744</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&amp;nbsp; The shares that are missing are not all newly created, although one of them is.&amp;nbsp; Some of them are quite old.&amp;nbsp; The acquisition is scheduled for every 30 minutes, and I had tried doing an "Acquire Now" as part of my initial attempt at troubleshooting it myself.&amp;nbsp; It's now been over a week that I've been seeing the problem (though admitedly I haven't been focused on this.&amp;nbsp; It's been sort of a background task between other work) and I am still having the problem. All of the acquisitions in the Data Sources screen show as "Completed".&amp;nbsp; There are no error messages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:17:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80534#M16744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gag_Halfront</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-10T17:17:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Shares Missing</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80538#M16746</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for getting back to me.&amp;nbsp; All of the acquisitions show as "Completed" in the "Data Sources" screen with no failures indicated.&amp;nbsp; If there's a problem, I'm not sure where to look.&amp;nbsp; Any guidance would be great.&amp;nbsp; As for upgrading to a later version of WFA, I am willing to do so, but I need to figure out where this data loss is happening first.&amp;nbsp; If I change a bunch of things without having any idea where the problem is, then I don't know if I can trust that the problem won't come back later.&amp;nbsp; If this was a known bug and a certain later GA version identified it as fixed, I'd be all sorted out.&amp;nbsp; That would be great.&amp;nbsp; So far, I haven't seen anything to indicate that this is the case, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently working through this in my lab, so there's minimal impact.&amp;nbsp; The bigger problem is that I can't ask my production guys to trust WFA to make decisions about where to provision storage when I can't trust the data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have opened a case on this so hopefully we can get to the bottom of it soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/CIFS-Shares-Missing/m-p/80538#M16746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gag_Halfront</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-10T17:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

