<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Snap Vault Volume Size Primary to Secondary Backup VMWARE in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80876#M16820</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not see where the #'s 750Gb and 1.5Tb come from based on the above screen snips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an equation used to calculate the secondary container size which in UM 5.0.2 only applies to SnapVault relationships.&amp;nbsp; In UM 5.1 and higher it also applies to VSM destinations.&amp;nbsp; The calculation uses primary volume size and usage #'s to generate the size of the secondary size and this will occur during protection jobs to ensure there is enough space to allow a vault operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kryan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-04T20:27:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snap Vault Volume Size Primary to Secondary Backup VMWARE</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80865#M16816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we're using Netapp OnCommand Host Package 1.1 with Netapp On Command Core Package 5.0.2 and VMWARE Virtual Center 5.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's Work as Designed. We creates a Local VMWARE Datastorwe&amp;nbsp; Backup Job, and then Snapvault it Daily to a Secondary Storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -------------------------------&amp;gt; Secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LUN Local Backup&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Snap Vault &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Retention 7 Daily&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Retention 7 Weeks Weekly&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daily 4 AM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Backup and Restore works fine. When the Snap Vault creates the Relation Ship, A Volume is Createted on the Secondary Syste much bigger then on Primary ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary Voulume to Snap Vault &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/21992_originalvolume-primary.jpg" width="1245" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondary Volume on Secondary System afer Snap Vault Relation Ship&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/21996_seconddaryvolume.jpg" width="1254" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why there is a 1,51 Tb Volume Creates instead of 750 GB ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found an Option in the Protection Policy which we are using. Is there a way too reduce the Volume Size on the Secondary Site, or can we Simple Shrink the Volumes Manually ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/21997_sanproperties.jpg" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80865#M16816</guid>
      <dc:creator>nettonetto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:58:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snap Vault Volume Size Primary to Secondary Backup VMWARE</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80870#M16818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any one an Idea ? Netapp Case Still Open without any recent helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80870#M16818</guid>
      <dc:creator>nettonetto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-26T14:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snap Vault Volume Size Primary to Secondary Backup VMWARE</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80876#M16820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not see where the #'s 750Gb and 1.5Tb come from based on the above screen snips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an equation used to calculate the secondary container size which in UM 5.0.2 only applies to SnapVault relationships.&amp;nbsp; In UM 5.1 and higher it also applies to VSM destinations.&amp;nbsp; The calculation uses primary volume size and usage #'s to generate the size of the secondary size and this will occur during protection jobs to ensure there is enough space to allow a vault operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snap-Vault-Volume-Size-Primary-to-Secondary-Backup-VMWARE/m-p/80876#M16820</guid>
      <dc:creator>kryan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-04T20:27:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

