<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic New Netapp 3240 with 8.1.7 ontap ,need help in aggregate creation. in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8074#M1697</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a disk shelve of 24 x600GB disks.i want to create a aggregate now what should i do should i use all the disk in one raid group or should i have multiple raid groups in an aggregate .Can any one suggest me the best practice to do it .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TWEET2ARUN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:17:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Netapp 3240 with 8.1.7 ontap ,need help in aggregate creation.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8074#M1697</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a disk shelve of 24 x600GB disks.i want to create a aggregate now what should i do should i use all the disk in one raid group or should i have multiple raid groups in an aggregate .Can any one suggest me the best practice to do it .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8074#M1697</guid>
      <dc:creator>TWEET2ARUN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:17:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Netapp 3240 with 8.1.7 ontap ,need help in aggregate creation.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8079#M1698</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be helpful to have a bit more information.&amp;nbsp; Also, did you mean 8.1 7-mode Ontap?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AFAIK, there is no version 8.1.7 yet.&amp;nbsp; Assuming 64-bit aggregate and raid-dp, I would create one raid group of 22 disks (save 2 disks for spares).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8079#M1698</guid>
      <dc:creator>resqme914</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T18:16:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Netapp 3240 with 8.1.7 ontap ,need help in aggregate creation.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8087#M1699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With SAS drives you can put up to 28 disks in a raid group or as little as 3. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So just create a new aggregate and put 23 disks in the aggregate and leave one as a spare. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The raid groups will automatically be created for you, however you can adjust the amount of disks before a new raid group is created in the aggregate. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm less conservative when it comes to this and take full advantage of 64bit aggregates, so I agree with what you're trying to do. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are some Pros and Cons, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pros&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: Better capacity, ability to create bigger volumes in return for bigger dedupe savings, and more iops. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cons:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; More exposure to a double disk failure and longer rebuilds on a disk failure. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could go a little deeper than that, but for me, these are the biggest factors.&amp;nbsp; If you haven't already, grab OnCommand System Manager 2.0.2 from the downloads section on support.netapp,com and do it up! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/New-Netapp-3240-with-8-1-7-ontap-need-help-in-aggregate-creation/m-p/8087#M1699</guid>
      <dc:creator>CCOLEMAN_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T20:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

