<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Measuring host resolution success in OCI in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Measuring-host-resolution-success-in-OCI/m-p/91071#M17015</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It is sometimes good to be able to measure how completely host resolution is working within an OCI instance.&amp;nbsp; The most apparent way to do this is by looking at the count of unidentified objects in the FC Identify interface.&amp;nbsp; Such a count is not very good, however, because&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There are always some connected, unidentified WWNs with no zoning or masking configuration.&amp;nbsp; Identifying these WWNs can be very difficult, and is typically unimportant because of the absence of any associated storage&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;This technique doesn't work in the DWH so applying it as an automated report is difficult.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;A better method of measuring host identification success is to consider the number of paths which include generic devices.&amp;nbsp; To quickly get this number from the OCI GUI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Go to the Paths view&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Filter for "-:" in the Hostname column&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Look at the object count numbers.&amp;nbsp; Divide the displayed count by the number of paths to get your percentage identified. &lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-middle" image-alt="77.png" style="width: 384px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/221iBEAD43B3718444B6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="77.png" alt="77.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this screenshot, 113,008 out of 115,644 paths, or 97.7%, contain no instances of the ":" character.&amp;nbsp; This indicating that they are identified to a hostname.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To derive the corresponding information from the Data Warehouse, look for a null hostId field in dwh_inventory.logical or dwh_inventory.physicalPath.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Credit for describing this method goes to Matt Ostiguy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:27:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Measuring host resolution success in OCI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Measuring-host-resolution-success-in-OCI/m-p/91071#M17015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is sometimes good to be able to measure how completely host resolution is working within an OCI instance.&amp;nbsp; The most apparent way to do this is by looking at the count of unidentified objects in the FC Identify interface.&amp;nbsp; Such a count is not very good, however, because&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There are always some connected, unidentified WWNs with no zoning or masking configuration.&amp;nbsp; Identifying these WWNs can be very difficult, and is typically unimportant because of the absence of any associated storage&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;This technique doesn't work in the DWH so applying it as an automated report is difficult.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;A better method of measuring host identification success is to consider the number of paths which include generic devices.&amp;nbsp; To quickly get this number from the OCI GUI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Go to the Paths view&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Filter for "-:" in the Hostname column&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Look at the object count numbers.&amp;nbsp; Divide the displayed count by the number of paths to get your percentage identified. &lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-middle" image-alt="77.png" style="width: 384px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/221iBEAD43B3718444B6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="77.png" alt="77.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this screenshot, 113,008 out of 115,644 paths, or 97.7%, contain no instances of the ":" character.&amp;nbsp; This indicating that they are identified to a hostname.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To derive the corresponding information from the Data Warehouse, look for a null hostId field in dwh_inventory.logical or dwh_inventory.physicalPath.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Credit for describing this method goes to Matt Ostiguy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Measuring-host-resolution-success-in-OCI/m-p/91071#M17015</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

