<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ?? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110075#M19430</link>
    <description>Option 1 : Backup and restore : Have two instances of the WFA server on the two geographical locations. One WFA instance as active and whenever you need to switch to other instance take a backup from Active instance and restore it on the standby instance. steps: 1. Take a Backup of the Active instance 2. Bring down the Active instance 3. Bring up the Standby Instance 4. Restore with the Backup taken on the Active instance. drawback: ------------- every-time you need to switch you need to take a backup and restore it on the standby instance and make it active. Option 2 : High-Availability : WFA supports High-Availability option in the latest release. but we support this configuration only on the same geographical location because the shared LUN between High-Availability WFA servers should be on the same location as WFA instances. Option 3: Disaster recovery solution : This is also more like a backup and restore solution, but both the instances will have the same UUID as the DR backup takes the entire system backup and restore.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 05:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arjunan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-23T05:31:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110053#M19428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My client has 2 different geographical data centers and asking us to implement WFA in active/standby mode , so that they can execute them from both if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does WFA supports active/standby config ?? did any one have implemented it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110053#M19428</guid>
      <dc:creator>madhu_gogalla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T23:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110054#M19429</link>
      <description>Madhu, I think you have a number of choices on an architecture. The right solution for your customer will depend on the next level of details on the requirements. I see a few options, and I suspect there may be others as well. 1) Run WFA on a VM, and setup a D/R instance in the remote site. Utilize the remote site D/R capabilities of your hyper-visor, or SMVI and SnapMirror. There are many ways to do this. This will give you one production instance of WFA to manage and logs/history (within RPO) will be available at the D/R site. You will only have the D/R instance available in the case of a true D/R scenario. 2) Setup two WFA instances. Run regular backups of the production WFA database and send to the D/R site. Again there are many ways to do this. In the case of a D/R, restore the latest backup on the D/R site and force data source acquisition. This will also give you one production instance the WFA database. You will need a change control process to keep both instances of the software at the same code release, and you will still have the same logs/history (within RPO) at the D/R site. 3) Setup two production WFA instances. You will need a change control process to ensure you release workflows and WFA configuration into both instances. You will not have history from a site that fails. You will not need to perform any D/R recovery for the second site. This is more active/active. Both sites will load the WFA cache from the same data sources. Mike</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110054#M19429</guid>
      <dc:creator>geringer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-22T15:53:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110075#M19430</link>
      <description>Option 1 : Backup and restore : Have two instances of the WFA server on the two geographical locations. One WFA instance as active and whenever you need to switch to other instance take a backup from Active instance and restore it on the standby instance. steps: 1. Take a Backup of the Active instance 2. Bring down the Active instance 3. Bring up the Standby Instance 4. Restore with the Backup taken on the Active instance. drawback: ------------- every-time you need to switch you need to take a backup and restore it on the standby instance and make it active. Option 2 : High-Availability : WFA supports High-Availability option in the latest release. but we support this configuration only on the same geographical location because the shared LUN between High-Availability WFA servers should be on the same location as WFA instances. Option 3: Disaster recovery solution : This is also more like a backup and restore solution, but both the instances will have the same UUID as the DR backup takes the entire system backup and restore.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 05:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/110075#M19430</guid>
      <dc:creator>arjunan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-23T05:31:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118738#M21186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13219"&gt;@arjunan&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Option 1 : Backup and restore : Have two instances of the WFA server on the two geographical locations. One WFA instance as active and whenever you need to switch to other instance take a backup from Active instance and restore it on the standby instance. steps: 1. Take a Backup of the Active instance 2. Bring down the Active instance 3. Bring up the Standby Instance 4. Restore with the Backup taken on the Active instance. drawback: ------------- every-time you need to switch you need to take a backup and restore it on the standby instance and make it active. Option 2 : High-Availability : WFA supports High-Availability option in the latest release. but we support this configuration only on the same geographical location because the shared LUN between High-Availability WFA servers should be on the same location as WFA instances. Option 3: Disaster recovery solution : This is also more like a backup and restore solution, but both the instances will have the same UUID as the DR backup takes the entire system backup and restore.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A couple of questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. For the active/active model (WFA in each site polling the same data sources) - would you have OCUM instances in each site as well, with each OCUM polling each cDOT cluster (assuming a manageable number of cDOT clusters)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Passive model: perform a similar backup/restore task with the OCUM server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks geringer and&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;arjunan.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:40:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118738#M21186</guid>
      <dc:creator>cbbarkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-26T18:40:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118744#M21187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi &lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-New-Contributor"&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/44131" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="login-bold"&gt;cbbarkin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. For the active/active model (WFA in each site polling the same data sources) - would you have OCUM instances in each site as well, with each OCUM polling each cDOT cluster (assuming a manageable number of cDOT clusters)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active\Active means if there is a failure of application\server in one location will be taken over by another site without downtime, what we support in WFA high-availability is Active\Passive option. The one node will be active and whenever the Active node goes down the passive will become Active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;whatever you have mentioned are two differnt instances,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- when one WFA at one site goes down while executing workflows that will not be taken care by another site as there is no link between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- This may help in monitoring but not for WFA application.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Passive model: perform a similar backup/restore task with the OCUM server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- I think OCUM supports backup\restore, i am not sure if they support comprehensive backup/restore&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prabu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Passive model: perform a similar backup/restore task with the OCUM server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- are you talking about OCUM instance ? The backup restore is supported in OCUM but i am not sure if they support Comprehensive restore\backup.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118744#M21187</guid>
      <dc:creator>arjunan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-27T04:36:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is WFA supports active/standby design ??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118765#M21194</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13219" target="_blank"&gt;arjunan&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response - I should have been clearer - I realize that neither OCUM nor WFA support what anyone would consider active/active. &amp;nbsp;I should have described it as independent instances of WFA/OCUM/OPM at each site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case for my client we've decided on a single VM with WFA/OCUM/OPM, that will be replicated to their three sites either with SMVI/SnapMirror or vSpere replication.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-WFA-supports-active-standby-design/m-p/118765#M21194</guid>
      <dc:creator>cbbarkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-27T13:36:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

