<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111622#M19752</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Per-VM provisioned capacity numbers in vm_capacity_fact should reflect the size of each VM's VMDKs plus other overheads such as swap files.&amp;nbsp; Each data store will contain some amount of overhead on top of the sum of provisioned capacity for VMs on that data store.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To dig into this in more detail, we would need to know the other columns you've included in your report.&amp;nbsp; This will determine which overheads Cognos will include.&amp;nbsp; It would also be helpful if you could specify what it is that you're comparing the OCI numbers to.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to look more closely at this yourself, I recommend that you also include the numbers reported in the OCI Java GUI in your analysis.&amp;nbsp; It's much easier in my opinion to tell exactly what it is that you're measuring in that interface than it is in Cognos or SQL.&amp;nbsp; This will help you determine whether there's a gap between your report and OCI's understanding of the environment, or between OCI's understanding and reality.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:46:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-23T14:46:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111513#M19738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a simple report that I am using&amp;nbsp;and it&amp;nbsp;will be of great benefit&amp;nbsp;but unfortunately the data is incorrect. I am using source&amp;nbsp;"VM Capacity-&amp;gt;Current VM Capacity Fact-&amp;gt;Provisioned Capacity GB" for my report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is that if compare the value with reality the numbers are slightly less. If I examine the value in "Datastores-&amp;gt;Provisioned Capacity" the numbers do not match. If I grab the information from Vcenter the values match OCI but not the source above in DWH.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there another source I should be using? I want the true Provisioned Capacity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 22:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111513#M19738</guid>
      <dc:creator>tony_dt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T22:59:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111622#M19752</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Per-VM provisioned capacity numbers in vm_capacity_fact should reflect the size of each VM's VMDKs plus other overheads such as swap files.&amp;nbsp; Each data store will contain some amount of overhead on top of the sum of provisioned capacity for VMs on that data store.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To dig into this in more detail, we would need to know the other columns you've included in your report.&amp;nbsp; This will determine which overheads Cognos will include.&amp;nbsp; It would also be helpful if you could specify what it is that you're comparing the OCI numbers to.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to look more closely at this yourself, I recommend that you also include the numbers reported in the OCI Java GUI in your analysis.&amp;nbsp; It's much easier in my opinion to tell exactly what it is that you're measuring in that interface than it is in Cognos or SQL.&amp;nbsp; This will help you determine whether there's a gap between your report and OCI's understanding of the environment, or between OCI's understanding and reality.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:46:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111622#M19752</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T14:46:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111634#M19754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. I have enclosed screenshot of the&amp;nbsp;report and the microview, but columns are Host Data Center|VM Cluster|Datastore|Actual Capacity GB|Provisioned Capacity GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. The OCI Microview is Inventory-&amp;gt;Datastores. The valus is correct in the&amp;nbsp;OCI Microview&amp;nbsp;and matches the VM Environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Provisioned Cpacity is off by 40GB reported by "Current VM Capacity Fact-&amp;gt;Provisioned Capacity GB".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111634#M19754</guid>
      <dc:creator>tony_dt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T18:05:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111965#M19809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're not trending the data over time, you can use the Inventory data mart which should match what you see in the thick client.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111965#M19809</guid>
      <dc:creator>graemeo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-29T15:36:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DWH Current VM Capacity Fact - Provisioned Capacity discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111976#M19811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tony, I don't see the attachments here so perhaps they were stripped before your message posted to the web site.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the DWH number for actual capacity 40GB over or 40GB under what you would expect based on looking at the web UI?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might be worth noting that "actual" in the VM mart is what we might call "Used" or "Consumed" in some other locations.&amp;nbsp; It's the amount of capacity consumed from a thin-provisioned data store.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/DWH-Current-VM-Capacity-Fact-Provisioned-Capacity-discrepancy/m-p/111976#M19811</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-29T18:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

