<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WFA upgrade in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10178#M2065</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yaron,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when we try to do installation when there is an WFA instance already exist.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The installer throws error "&lt;EM&gt;setup cannot continue, the following TCP ports are busy HTTP 80 ,HTTPs 443, MySQL 3306&lt;/EM&gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of this error we can have popup message or error message stating "&lt;EM&gt;Either WFA is already installed or if u want to upgrade please follow the upgrade procedure in IAG&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will avoid confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sundar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sundarea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-24T15:23:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WFA upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10164#M2060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In WFA IAG it is mentions that to upgrade WFA version &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 .we have to backup the database of current WFA .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Uninstall current WFA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Install the upgrade version and Restore the database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there any reason behind it? why we are not able upgrade like any other off-tap product.where there is no need to do database backup and restore for upgrade?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sundar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10164#M2060</guid>
      <dc:creator>sundarea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:51:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10169#M2062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sundar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's a reason for it, though I believe it will be reconsidered in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WFA has an internal cache DB and a configuration DB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the phases during the upgrade (The restoration) takes the DBs and upgrades them to match any required changes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;made to the certified content on the new release. This includes complete rebuild of the DB schema.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While probably possible to do in an in-place upgrade, its nicer and safer to do a clean installation and freshly deploy the DB for&lt;BR /&gt;restore ( &amp;amp; upgrade) and have that pre-upgrade DB in hand for revert, should a need arise (We cannot be held accountable to all&lt;BR /&gt;non-certified components, and one may break if it was created in a non-conformant way). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference between the proposed scenario is the uninstall - And surely that's not a big thing to do... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron Haimsohn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:39:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10169#M2062</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-24T14:39:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10178#M2065</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yaron,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when we try to do installation when there is an WFA instance already exist.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The installer throws error "&lt;EM&gt;setup cannot continue, the following TCP ports are busy HTTP 80 ,HTTPs 443, MySQL 3306&lt;/EM&gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of this error we can have popup message or error message stating "&lt;EM&gt;Either WFA is already installed or if u want to upgrade please follow the upgrade procedure in IAG&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will avoid confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sundar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10178#M2065</guid>
      <dc:creator>sundarea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-24T15:23:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10182#M2067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sundar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, some other application can occupy some of those ports as well &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the upgrade procedure is well documented in the IAG - I think this is pretty much covered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then again - It might be good to hint at that possibility....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will open a feature idea for their consideration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-upgrade/m-p/10182#M2067</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-24T15:28:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

