<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: hostname.abc.com_[1-9].vmdk capacity message from OCI in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116468#M20709</link>
    <description>Hi hightsnj,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would think the vmdk's are thick provisioned. In which case they would not need show up in OCI as being full to 100%.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-29T23:36:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>hostname.abc.com_[1-9].vmdk capacity message from OCI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116467#M20708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In OCI show VM asset page, I&amp;nbsp;am getting this message in the bottom, and complaining about capacity 100% full on all 1-9 vmdk disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not so familiar with VMware, but the datastore volume seems under utilized, and no issues. On the VM (Linux) side, when I do df -k command, it looks fine as well, not full.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what should I check on VMware side, what cuuld be the cause?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116467#M20708</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:55:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hostname.abc.com_[1-9].vmdk capacity message from OCI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116468#M20709</link>
      <description>Hi hightsnj,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would think the vmdk's are thick provisioned. In which case they would not need show up in OCI as being full to 100%.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116468#M20709</guid>
      <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T23:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: hostname.abc.com_[1-9].vmdk capacity message from OCI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116469#M20710</link>
      <description>Sorry, wrote this on my iPhone. I meant indeed instead of not need.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/hostname-abc-com-1-9-vmdk-capacity-message-from-OCI/m-p/116469#M20710</guid>
      <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T23:37:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

