<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Options for &amp;quot;OnCommand Systems Manager&amp;quot; under CDOT (bundled, vs. Linux or Windows pack in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/117000#M20816</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;OnCommand System Manager is still available as a download to install on an admin's desktop (it's an admin UI, not a server), but for your new cDOT clusters it will just be a jump point to the embedded version on each (yes, just like FilerView used to be embedded). &amp;nbsp;If the 7mode filers are going away completely and these 2 clusters are the only objects being managed, you really don't need to install it locally, just create yourself boomarks in your browser to each cluster. &amp;nbsp;Make sure you checkout the latest release candidates for OnCommand Unified Manager (6.4rc1) and OnCommand Performance Manager (2.1rc1), as they link the UI so you only need a single URL to access both products. &amp;nbsp;It still requires you to use 2 VMs, and you are essenually drilling down into each UI from the top level but saves you a bookmark and allows you to manage access to both from the OCUM user administration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamesIlderton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-11T18:46:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Options for "OnCommand Systems Manager" under CDOT (bundled, vs. Linux or Windows packages)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/116946#M20800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are about to convert from IBM nSeries running 7-mode to NetApp 8020's running CDOT, 2 clusters in 2 data centers, snapmirror configured as a "source" and a "DR-site".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In preperation I am setting up management-systems (VM's) for the newer versions of:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OnCommand Systems Manager&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OnCommand Unified Manager&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OnCommand Performance Manager&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;"OnCommand Systems Manager" under CDOT comes "bundled" into the OnTap, as well as in Windows or Linux installation packages.&amp;nbsp; This seems beneficial as I won't have to worry about upgrading the application independantly of OnTap.&amp;nbsp; I'm assuming with 2 seperate CDOT clusters that 1 web-browser can have 2 tabs, 1 per IP address (1 per cluster) and access/manage the 2 clusters independantly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume if we were to install either the Windows or Linux packages on a server (VM) we could then have the tytpical "single-pane" view, showing both clusters, although we then have to maintain/upgrade the application as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHAT'S YOUR EXPERIENCE?&amp;nbsp; Am I correct in my understanding?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/116946#M20800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kent-at-Cornell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for "OnCommand Systems Manager" under CDOT (bundled, vs. Linux or Windows pack</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/117000#M20816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OnCommand System Manager is still available as a download to install on an admin's desktop (it's an admin UI, not a server), but for your new cDOT clusters it will just be a jump point to the embedded version on each (yes, just like FilerView used to be embedded). &amp;nbsp;If the 7mode filers are going away completely and these 2 clusters are the only objects being managed, you really don't need to install it locally, just create yourself boomarks in your browser to each cluster. &amp;nbsp;Make sure you checkout the latest release candidates for OnCommand Unified Manager (6.4rc1) and OnCommand Performance Manager (2.1rc1), as they link the UI so you only need a single URL to access both products. &amp;nbsp;It still requires you to use 2 VMs, and you are essenually drilling down into each UI from the top level but saves you a bookmark and allows you to manage access to both from the OCUM user administration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/117000#M20816</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesIlderton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T18:46:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for "OnCommand Systems Manager" under CDOT (bundled, vs. Linux or Windows pack</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/117003#M20818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, the 2 CDOT clusters will be all all we'll have after the migration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it sounds like using the CDOT embedded Systems Manager, and 2 VM's running NetApp's provided VM images for the RC versions of OCUM and OCPM is your suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By the time we get this done those 2 may be past RC status to GA, a good-thing from our point of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Options-for-quot-OnCommand-Systems-Manager-quot-under-CDOT-bundled-vs-Linux-or/m-p/117003#M20818</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kent-at-Cornell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:33:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

