<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117942#M20965</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I found some solution for the setting the timeframe back &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set a filter that looks like that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;_age([Full Date]) &amp;lt; 010601&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;One remark&lt;/STRONG&gt;: you have to set the processing to 'local'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I have always only the last 18 months as moving timeframe. It is a bit odd, but it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>INGO_REPINZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-05T11:03:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117891#M20943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying currently to build some reports with historical data:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1 for the SAN-Storage for a specific host which have a size bigger than some value x&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1 for tha discovered Storage Arrays&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both should be able to present historical data up to the current date.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the best datamart(s) to be used? The Inventory, which holds only current values is it not. I was looking into the package "Storage and Storage Pools" but there I'm somehow not get the data like I want. (Either it is already aggregated in some way, or I do not get the historical data). Unfortunatly the Cognos Error-Messages are not really helping to look for the Issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the first Case, I did find a solution with a hand-crafted SQL, but there I can't generate a graph out of it, I'm stuck with 'No Data found'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117891#M20943</guid>
      <dc:creator>INGO_REPINZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:34:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117893#M20944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ingo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would start with the chargeback datamart, specifically with the dwh_capacity.chargeback_fact table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is something you should be able to simply drag&amp;amp;drop (see screenshot attached).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For adding the data items to the charts, make sure the aggregare function is something other than&amp;nbsp;"None" or "Automatic". "Total" should work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope thos helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerhard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117893#M20944</guid>
      <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T09:04:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117896#M20947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply! I have too much volumes in, because I have also some OS-Volumes in the total. But with this I can live.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like also to limit the values I display to only the last 18 months , I have tried it with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;[Full Date] &amp;gt; (_add_months (maximum([Full Date]),-18))&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it looks like the clause did not effect the result at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be great for the first report and the second as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:18:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117896#M20947</guid>
      <dc:creator>INGO_REPINZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T10:18:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117914#M20955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Additional info to the second report:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Report for the storage arrays should provide a historical listing of the raw space and the consumed space at the time. Also the total of provisioned volumes is required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here I'm stuck a bit, because I did not find any way to get data from the past and to connect more packages (which is not a easy tasl in Cognos, as I figured out)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&amp;nbsp;Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117914#M20955</guid>
      <dc:creator>INGO_REPINZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T13:38:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117919#M20957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ingo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sorry, I didn't have much time today to look at the specifics of the filter you're trying to set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But basically the more complexity you'd like to have in your report, the sooner you'll reach the limits of what is possible with drag&amp;amp;drop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you feel you've reached that point, your choices are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Acqire decent SQL skills.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Define the speficis of your requirements and have the report you need custom tailored for you by our PS services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd love to help you out if I can find a bit of time, so please feel free to shoot me a mail directly (I have a feeling you already have my contact details).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerhard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117919#M20957</guid>
      <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T15:43:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117924#M20959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A couple of thoughts on how you might troubleshoot this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure [Full Date] is a data element in the query to which you're applying the filter. Use the query editor screen to set it up, if you're not doing so already.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's going to be difficulut to get maximum([FullDate]) to do what you want, or at least it has been for me.&amp;nbsp; You might try specifying an "over" clause on the Maximum function, otherwise it will calculate maximum([FullDate]) on each line so every line will be included.&amp;nbsp; If you can't get that working, use the current date instead of maximum([FullDate]).&amp;nbsp; If you're reaching back 18 months, this should be close enough.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117924#M20959</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T17:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI DWH (7.1) Report on storage array with historical data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117942#M20965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I found some solution for the setting the timeframe back &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I set a filter that looks like that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;_age([Full Date]) &amp;lt; 010601&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;One remark&lt;/STRONG&gt;: you have to set the processing to 'local'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I have always only the last 18 months as moving timeframe. It is a bit odd, but it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-DWH-7-1-Report-on-storage-array-with-historical-data/m-p/117942#M20965</guid>
      <dc:creator>INGO_REPINZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-05T11:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

