<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10573#M2126</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Besr Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bruno&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS:sorry for this mistake.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bpicard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-15T06:54:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10551#M2119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I installed latest version of Ops Mgr (3.8) and NetApp Management Console (2.3) and i try to integrate SMO with Protection Manager (worked with previous releases).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What i try to do is to protect my Oracle Instance using SnapVault (with dedup enabled at the destination).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To do that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - I created a "provisioning" policy, storate type "Secondary" with availability properties that match a resource pool i proviously created and dedup enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - I created a "Protection" Policy with characteristics i wanted to protect my Oracle Instance (worked previously)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - Using SMO, i modified my profile to be protected by the previously created Protection Policy =&amp;gt; This created the Dataset in Protection Manager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What i now try to do (unsucessfuly) is to protect my dataset sith a Snapvault relationship (to have dedup activated after each snapvault update):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - I modify the Dataset to use the "provisioning policy" previously created&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.netapp.com/" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.netapp.com/" /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.netapp.com/" /&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Picture1.gif" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="http://communities.netapp.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/4256/Picture1.gif" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i remove "Snapmirror" licence on the secondary, it doesn't work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Picture2.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="http://communities.netapp.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/4263/Picture2.png" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i add Snapmirror licence, i always use a QSM relationship (i have the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;dfm option pmQSMBackupPreferred set to No &lt;BR /&gt;and all the following are false:&lt;BR /&gt;If the schedule specifies that the data is to be backed up more&lt;BR /&gt;frequently than once per hour &amp;lt;= false&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the source qtree contains a space in its name &amp;lt;= false&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the source data is an Open Systems directory &amp;lt;= false)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Picture3.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="http://communities.netapp.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/4264/Picture3.png" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;How to do to have a Snapvault relationship created ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Bruno&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10551#M2119</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpicard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10556#M2121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you give the output of "dfpm policy get &amp;lt;secondary_provisioning_policy&amp;gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is a dedupe schedule set in the policy, QSM is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shailaja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10556#M2121</guid>
      <dc:creator>shailaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T06:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10561#M2123</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.SHOWPARIS&amp;gt;dfpm policy get "Volume Vault avec Dedup activee"&lt;BR /&gt;Name:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Volume Vault avec Dedup activee&lt;BR /&gt;Description:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Volume Vault avec Dedup activee&lt;BR /&gt;Type:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; secondary&lt;BR /&gt;Disk Failure Reliability:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; any&lt;BR /&gt;Sub System Failure Reliability:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Disabled&lt;BR /&gt;Controller Failure Reliability:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Disabled&lt;BR /&gt;Resource Label:&lt;BR /&gt;Dataset Member Deduplication Option:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;Dataset Member Deduplication Schedule:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0@mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat,sun&lt;BR /&gt;Dataset Member Nearly Full Threshold (%): 95&lt;BR /&gt;Dataset Member Full Threshold (%):&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 99&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes (default one)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Picture1.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="http://communities.netapp.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/4265/Picture1.png" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bruno&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10561#M2123</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpicard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T06:39:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10566#M2125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deduplication schedules cannot be set on SnapVault destination volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The deduplication schedule is tied to the SnapVault schedule (backup schedule in protection policy) on the destination system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you change the schedule attribute on your provisioning policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dfpm policy set &amp;lt;secondary_provisioning_policy&amp;gt; dedupeSchedule="none"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that, retry the relationship creation and check if SV relationships are created when the dataset is conformed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shailaja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10566#M2125</guid>
      <dc:creator>shailaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T06:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault instead of QSM in protection Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10573#M2126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Besr Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bruno&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS:sorry for this mistake.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Snapvault-instead-of-QSM-in-protection-Manager/m-p/10573#M2126</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpicard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T06:54:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

