<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Isilon Capacity reported in OCI 7.1.2 in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Isilon-Capacity-reported-in-OCI-7-1-2/m-p/120576#M21614</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;out of a fisrt impulse, I would suspect because Isilon is lying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And that should be fine as long as you know about it. It is after all the basis for "thin provisioning".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you verify the capacities you are seeing in OCI are the same the the native storage management utilities report?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When it comes to capacities, OCI basically takes the information received for a particular object and showes it to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if a single internal volume has twice the size of the capacities of all the disks, it's becuase it's reported as such by the array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And who knows? Maybe the array has some magic compression capabilities to allow storing of that much data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerhard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-24T13:55:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Isilon Capacity reported in OCI 7.1.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Isilon-Capacity-reported-in-OCI-7-1-2/m-p/120398#M21570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I've asked this question before but I can no longer find the thread (it has been awhile...). &amp;nbsp;In OCI, the capacity of Isilon arrays is reported as double the raw capacity. &amp;nbsp;For example, raw capacity reports as 600TB, but the capacity reports as 1200TB. &amp;nbsp;Why is that? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Isilon-Capacity-reported-in-OCI-7-1-2/m-p/120398#M21570</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBARBALACE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T20:20:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isilon Capacity reported in OCI 7.1.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Isilon-Capacity-reported-in-OCI-7-1-2/m-p/120576#M21614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;out of a fisrt impulse, I would suspect because Isilon is lying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And that should be fine as long as you know about it. It is after all the basis for "thin provisioning".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you verify the capacities you are seeing in OCI are the same the the native storage management utilities report?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When it comes to capacities, OCI basically takes the information received for a particular object and showes it to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if a single internal volume has twice the size of the capacities of all the disks, it's becuase it's reported as such by the array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And who knows? Maybe the array has some magic compression capabilities to allow storing of that much data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerhard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Isilon-Capacity-reported-in-OCI-7-1-2/m-p/120576#M21614</guid>
      <dc:creator>hotz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-24T13:55:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

