<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EMC Unity support future in OCI? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125282#M22450</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I didn't see the EMC Unity array getting a datasource in 7.2.3 release notes. Since we're testing one right now (and it will &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; discover as a VNXe) we would like to know if it's on the roadmap to be added in the near-term.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tflammger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:18:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EMC Unity support future in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125282#M22450</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I didn't see the EMC Unity array getting a datasource in 7.2.3 release notes. Since we're testing one right now (and it will &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; discover as a VNXe) we would like to know if it's on the roadmap to be added in the near-term.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125282#M22450</guid>
      <dc:creator>tflammger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EMC Unity support future in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125285#M22451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you running v7.2.3 today?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data source updates sit in the Service Pack release notes (the SPs come out at roughly the same time as the minor software releases), whereas the minor releases notes have the details on software feature enhancements and server-side fixes.. There have been a couple of SPs since v7.2.2 was released, including one note for 7.2SP3 that says: VNXe - Fix recording and add support for Unity VSA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're on the latest release or service pack and still seeing the problem, then I think it would be worth opening a support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125285#M22451</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-10T16:02:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EMC Unity support future in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125377#M22482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nah, not running 7.2.3 yet...&amp;nbsp;conservative organization, hard to get traction on running RC releases. They like me to stick to GA. Even so we're at: &amp;nbsp;OnCommand Insight 7.2.1 &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;build 7, service pack 2&amp;nbsp; (too many useful features in 7.2.x to ignore).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Guess I'll have to&amp;nbsp;try moving up to patch4, since as you mention, patch3 does have a&amp;nbsp;Unity specific fix in it. (though that is just the virtual appliance, doesn't say anything about an acutal unity datasource).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:03:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125377#M22482</guid>
      <dc:creator>tflammger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-14T22:03:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EMC Unity support future in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125379#M22483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same issue on patch4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG title="clip_image002.jpg" alt="clip_image002.jpg" src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6420i2C3EDAA01655E739/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;2016-11-14 17:14:06,613 FATAL [DSM-pool-2-thread-4/prkclemcunity [foundation]] com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource (BaseDataSource.java:745) - [foundation] prkclemcunity - Runtime exception: For input string: "sv_1"

java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "sv_1"

        at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)

        at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:580)

        at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:615)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.transform.VNXeTransform.populateVolumesFromAppBasedBlockResources(VNXeTransform.java:503)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.transform.VNXeTransform.transform(VNXeTransform.java:51)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.VNXeDataSource.doFoundation(VNXeDataSource.java:77)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.foundation.datasource.BaseFoundationPackage.pollNow(BaseFoundationPackage.java:195)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.run(BaseDataSource.java:422)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitPackageContext(BaseDataSource.java:411)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitClassLoader(BaseDataSource.java:392)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runNotifyListeners(BaseDataSource.java:367)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitLog(BaseDataSource.java:344)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitRecordingSession(BaseDataSource.java:309)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitThreadName(BaseDataSource.java:294)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runWithProfiler(BaseDataSource.java:273)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.run(BaseDataSource.java:249)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.mgmt.DataSourceManager$PollLogic.run(DataSourceManager.java:721)

        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)

        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)

        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)

        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)

        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

2016-11-14 17:14:06,613 ERROR [DSM-pool-2-thread-4/prkclemcunity [foundation]] com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource (DataSourceErrorException.java:224) - prkclemcunity [Internal error] - For input string: "sv_1" ([Device name ]: For input string: "sv_1")

com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.DataSourceErrorException: For input string: "sv_1"

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.DataSourceErrorException.createWithEnhanced(DataSourceErrorException.java:70)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.handleThrowable(BaseDataSource.java:755)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.run(BaseDataSource.java:455)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitPackageContext(BaseDataSource.java:411)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitClassLoader(BaseDataSource.java:392)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runNotifyListeners(BaseDataSource.java:367)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitLog(BaseDataSource.java:344)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitRecordingSession(BaseDataSource.java:309)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runInitThreadName(BaseDataSource.java:294)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.runWithProfiler(BaseDataSource.java:273)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.run(BaseDataSource.java:249)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.mgmt.DataSourceManager$PollLogic.run(DataSourceManager.java:721)

        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)

        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)

        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)

        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)

        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "sv_1"

        at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)

        at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:580)

        at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:615)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.transform.VNXeTransform.populateVolumesFromAppBasedBlockResources(VNXeTransform.java:503)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.transform.VNXeTransform.transform(VNXeTransform.java:51)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.datasource.emc_vnxe_cli.VNXeDataSource.doFoundation(VNXeDataSource.java:77)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.foundation.datasource.BaseFoundationPackage.pollNow(BaseFoundationPackage.java:195)

        at com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource.run(BaseDataSource.java:422)

        ... 14 more

2016-11-14 17:14:06,676 INFO [DSM-pool-2-thread-4] com.onaro.sanscreen.acquisition.framework.datasource.BaseDataSource (BaseDataSource.java:277) - [foundation] prkclemcunity - Finished acquisition (11670 ms)

&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guess I’ll probably have to open a support case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:20:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125379#M22483</guid>
      <dc:creator>tflammger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-14T22:20:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EMC Unity support future in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125380#M22484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So we have a couple problems:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uemcli.exe" -d&amp;nbsp;a.b.c.d -u admin -p ******** -sslPolicy accept /stor/prov/vmware/vmfs show -detail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Information is different - we can figure out how to parse it, but the problem is that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LUN ID&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iSCSI target&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;are no longer there. We need to report LUN ID. The same problem is true for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...-sslPolicy accept /stor/prov/luns/lun show -detail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, unfortunately, this isn't a pure parsing adjustment exercise&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-support-future-in-OCI/m-p/125380#M22484</guid>
      <dc:creator>ostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-15T00:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

