<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WFA support for vserver (SVM) comment field in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128611#M23093</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm aware that WFA doesn't gather vserver/SVM comment fields in the WFA Cache. I'm looking at WFA 3.1 (and 4.1rc1) and OCUM 6.4 and it doesn't appear to come through (ONTAP to OCUM to WFA).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is does or will this show up in any of the newer OCUM (7.x) and/or WFA releases ... and/or does a BURT exisit for this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've cloned and modified the 'Create and config SVM' command to build and apply a useful comment on newly created SVMs but can not get back at that information via the WFA Cache. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dkorns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:23:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WFA support for vserver (SVM) comment field</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128611#M23093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm aware that WFA doesn't gather vserver/SVM comment fields in the WFA Cache. I'm looking at WFA 3.1 (and 4.1rc1) and OCUM 6.4 and it doesn't appear to come through (ONTAP to OCUM to WFA).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is does or will this show up in any of the newer OCUM (7.x) and/or WFA releases ... and/or does a BURT exisit for this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've cloned and modified the 'Create and config SVM' command to build and apply a useful comment on newly created SVMs but can not get back at that information via the WFA Cache. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128611#M23093</guid>
      <dc:creator>dkorns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA support for vserver (SVM) comment field</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128882#M23147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50112"&gt;@dkorns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if OCUM has any plans to do it. There have been requirements for a long time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't want to wait endlessly, take the matter in your hands do it yourself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have 2 options.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. OCUM6.3+ has provided a feature called OCUM Data Collector which can create a new OCUM DB table and provide the column values which are obtained using API. So if the API is giving the value ( Vserver Comment is ) then this can be fetched in OCUM DB in another table. This method requires you to make a configuration file in a given format which needs a bit of document read.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now you need to create a new dictionary in WFA . Then then add a new cache-query to acquire this this data into WFA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Make a new scheme and a new dictionary in WFA. Make a new Script Based Data Source type. For each Cluster -&amp;gt; each vserver seen by WFA, execute cmdlet and get the data you need. make CSV.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a new Data Source for this type, the successful acquistion will get it done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm planning to provide a detailed document with examples for both methods. If you are in a hurry , I can proivde option(2) immediately.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sinhaa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:35:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128882#M23147</guid>
      <dc:creator>sinhaa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-10T05:35:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WFA support for vserver (SVM) comment field</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128883#M23148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am answering the UM7.x question :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UM7.x is also not collecting the SVM comment information from ONTAP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an alternative solution, the approach shared by Sinha should work. Its easy to implement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saravanan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/WFA-support-for-vserver-SVM-comment-field/m-p/128883#M23148</guid>
      <dc:creator>msaravan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-10T05:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

