<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Conflict when bringing up a second DFM server in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-when-bringing-up-a-second-DFM-server/m-p/11579#M2361</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We presently have a DFM v5.2 server managing our SnapMirror and SnapVault between our production and disaster recovery site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The protection policy is triggered via the SMO profile and schedules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find our self having to bring up a DFM v5.0 in order to support a host/client with an SMO @3.1p1 and Snapdrive v5.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every time I bring up the DFM server, which has identical hosts Storage Systems configured, the v5.2 DFM datasets protection starts lagging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI in the v5.0, I have not even configured the datasets, so nothing is really running there. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I shutdown the v5.0 DFM processes; all goes back to normal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any clue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks! Tania.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>taniaeortega</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:31:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Conflict when bringing up a second DFM server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-when-bringing-up-a-second-DFM-server/m-p/11579#M2361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We presently have a DFM v5.2 server managing our SnapMirror and SnapVault between our production and disaster recovery site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The protection policy is triggered via the SMO profile and schedules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find our self having to bring up a DFM v5.0 in order to support a host/client with an SMO @3.1p1 and Snapdrive v5.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every time I bring up the DFM server, which has identical hosts Storage Systems configured, the v5.2 DFM datasets protection starts lagging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI in the v5.0, I have not even configured the datasets, so nothing is really running there. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I shutdown the v5.0 DFM processes; all goes back to normal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any clue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks! Tania.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-when-bringing-up-a-second-DFM-server/m-p/11579#M2361</guid>
      <dc:creator>taniaeortega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

