<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Alert of SnapMirror Lag Times in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130849#M23693</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I hated protection manager. &amp;nbsp;I know some people loved it, unless you got hit by 'reaper', which was dbreaper and it would wack relationships.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to find the new solution adequate. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear your rant, but things are getting better. &amp;nbsp;I'm telling you, i still miss performance advisor, but life goes on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I tend to disagree, the UI on 7.x is great. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 18:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-05T18:11:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alert of SnapMirror Lag Times</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130845#M23690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a simple question... I actually thought it would be a simple task... but its not &amp;nbsp;turning out that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have OnTap 8.3.2 with OC Unified Manager 6.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We snapmirror snaps from 2 critical volumes every 15 minutes... &amp;nbsp;I want to configure an alert that emails me when the lag time on these gets to be 30 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so far in UM, I've found that I can setup an alert for SnapMirror Relationship Lag warnings... but at what threshold?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I go into Setup Options &amp;gt; Thresholds &amp;gt; Relationships and find this... "Lag Thresholds for Unmanaged Relationships (what does that even mean?) And a setting in %&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is this set to default 150% for warning and 250% for critical? &amp;nbsp;what does this mean? &amp;nbsp;150% of what?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;why can't we just keep this simple..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alert me when the lag time is = x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this was possible in 7-mode solutions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why does it seem like NetApp is de-evolving?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm hoping someone out there can show me that I'm just missing somethign here....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130845#M23690</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonyParker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alert of SnapMirror Lag Times</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130846#M23691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its still the same, just different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those values are a % of your cron job&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, 150% of 1hr is 1.5hours &amp;nbsp;Then you get alert .. and so on&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 17:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130846#M23691</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-05T17:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alert of SnapMirror Lag Times</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130847#M23692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply and explaination... I'll go with that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but my point remains...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;why has Netapp gone from this...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka31A00000013MHQAY/how-to-monitor-existing-snapmirror-snapvault-relationships-with-oncommand-unified-manager-s-protection-manager?language=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka31A00000013MHQAY/how-to-monitor-existing-snapmirror-snapvault-relationships-with-oncommand-unified-manager-s-protection-manager?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to somthing that has none of that...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what was so hard about providing us a straightforward way of creating an alert that simply says hey, let me know if the lagtime on this exceeds 'x' min. &amp;nbsp;This stuff doesn't have to be obfuscated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My colleague and I struggle to find anything useful in the current UM and also struggle to find well explained documents on any of it. &amp;nbsp;I has a horrible UI, and seems to present a small fraction of the usefullness of previous versions. &amp;nbsp;If we're ignorant, and they are in fact in there somewhere, then they've hidden them well. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why can we not have ONE tool, baked into Ontap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I create a volume I want a wizard that has pages that ask - hey, would you like an alert on this volume? &amp;nbsp;would you like to protect this volume? would you like alerts on that protection?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sorry for ranting but frustrated with whatever vision NetApp has right now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 17:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130847#M23692</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonyParker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-05T17:57:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alert of SnapMirror Lag Times</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130849#M23693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I hated protection manager. &amp;nbsp;I know some people loved it, unless you got hit by 'reaper', which was dbreaper and it would wack relationships.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to find the new solution adequate. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear your rant, but things are getting better. &amp;nbsp;I'm telling you, i still miss performance advisor, but life goes on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I tend to disagree, the UI on 7.x is great. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 18:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Alert-of-SnapMirror-Lag-Times/m-p/130849#M23693</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-05T18:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

