<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Conflict in Switch performance data in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-in-Switch-performance-data/m-p/133848#M24284</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created a switch performance report for a customer including different metrics like CRC error, Link failre count, sync loss count, signal loss count, encoding in/out errors. But when I compare the report output with the historical graph from web UI. There is a conflict.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of above performance metrics showing some values like 4,6,20 and encoding in/out showing values range from -90,000,000 to 800,000,000. When I open same port from webUI and see the history, that shows 0 for all parameters. When we checked the stats on switch, it also show 0 errors. Same thing observed on many switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does ETL process change anything during its process? I tried to set aggregate and roll up function to none. Not worked&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OCI version 7.2.3-206&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brocade 6510&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brocade 6520&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brocade 8510&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sunil-yadav</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:41:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Conflict in Switch performance data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-in-Switch-performance-data/m-p/133848#M24284</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created a switch performance report for a customer including different metrics like CRC error, Link failre count, sync loss count, signal loss count, encoding in/out errors. But when I compare the report output with the historical graph from web UI. There is a conflict.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of above performance metrics showing some values like 4,6,20 and encoding in/out showing values range from -90,000,000 to 800,000,000. When I open same port from webUI and see the history, that shows 0 for all parameters. When we checked the stats on switch, it also show 0 errors. Same thing observed on many switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does ETL process change anything during its process? I tried to set aggregate and roll up function to none. Not worked&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OCI version 7.2.3-206&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brocade 6510&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brocade 6520&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brocade 8510&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-in-Switch-performance-data/m-p/133848#M24284</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunil-yadav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:41:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Conflict in Switch performance data</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-in-Switch-performance-data/m-p/133897#M24297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Case has been opened for that with support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Conflict-in-Switch-performance-data/m-p/133897#M24297</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunil-yadav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-24T11:19:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

