<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lots of question about Service Level Manager in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Lots-of-question-about-Service-Level-Manager/m-p/134636#M24436</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you will not be discouraged by so many questions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is OCUM or OPM mandatory for SLM to work ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If OCUM or OPM is not mandatory but missing in SLM setting what features are lost ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does Conformance check use OPM counters or perf. counters directly from cluster ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When importing workload what hapen if some workloads cannot be imported ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does this mean that QOS policy could not be applied to these workloads ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does this mean that storage pool budgeting could not take into account these workloads and so distort results ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Volumes with both CIFS and NFS shares seems to be unimportable in SLM 1.0. Right ? Some plan to support it on future release ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When we have on a volume with several qtrees with CIFS and NFS shares defined on them, Can SLM manage SLO/QOS on this volume which hosts these qtrees ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is the criteria used by SLM to provision a volume into a storage pool (aggregate)&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;available space in the storage pool: &lt;STRONG&gt;OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;available IOPS on storage pool. &lt;STRONG&gt;QUESTION HERE&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Only based on budgeting and not on the real measured IOPS ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;requested space: &lt;STRONG&gt;OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;requested SLO: &lt;STRONG&gt;QUESTION HERE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How IOPS limit is computed from SLO while the used volume size is 0 &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use Absolute Minimum IOPS parameter ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is IOPS limit set on the volume QOS policy&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SLO peak (IOPS/TB) * volume used size (TB) ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SLO Expected (IOPS/TB) * volume used size (TB) ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;... ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;More general question: How SLO parameters are used to set QOS or check conformance, etc...&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Peak IOPS/TB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Expected IOPS/TB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Peak Latency&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Initial Peak IOPS Allocation&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Over-subscribe Expected IOPS&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Absolute Minimum&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Something I do not understand in the documentation. That look controdictory for me about the provision of new workloads. Thanks to clarify&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Page 6: Standard capacities: Automatic provisioning per the storage service level by using APIs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Page 9: Configuring new workloads for using storage service levels (SSLs) and service level objective-based (SLO-based) APIs involves enabling the SLO advanced license&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;in my understanding "configuring new workload" means "provisioning new workload" but maybe I am worng&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your patience&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>christig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lots of question about Service Level Manager</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Lots-of-question-about-Service-Level-Manager/m-p/134636#M24436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you will not be discouraged by so many questions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is OCUM or OPM mandatory for SLM to work ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If OCUM or OPM is not mandatory but missing in SLM setting what features are lost ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does Conformance check use OPM counters or perf. counters directly from cluster ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When importing workload what hapen if some workloads cannot be imported ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does this mean that QOS policy could not be applied to these workloads ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does this mean that storage pool budgeting could not take into account these workloads and so distort results ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Volumes with both CIFS and NFS shares seems to be unimportable in SLM 1.0. Right ? Some plan to support it on future release ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When we have on a volume with several qtrees with CIFS and NFS shares defined on them, Can SLM manage SLO/QOS on this volume which hosts these qtrees ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is the criteria used by SLM to provision a volume into a storage pool (aggregate)&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;available space in the storage pool: &lt;STRONG&gt;OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;available IOPS on storage pool. &lt;STRONG&gt;QUESTION HERE&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Only based on budgeting and not on the real measured IOPS ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;requested space: &lt;STRONG&gt;OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;requested SLO: &lt;STRONG&gt;QUESTION HERE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How IOPS limit is computed from SLO while the used volume size is 0 &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use Absolute Minimum IOPS parameter ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What is IOPS limit set on the volume QOS policy&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SLO peak (IOPS/TB) * volume used size (TB) ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SLO Expected (IOPS/TB) * volume used size (TB) ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;... ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;More general question: How SLO parameters are used to set QOS or check conformance, etc...&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Peak IOPS/TB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Expected IOPS/TB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Peak Latency&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Initial Peak IOPS Allocation&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Over-subscribe Expected IOPS&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Absolute Minimum&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Something I do not understand in the documentation. That look controdictory for me about the provision of new workloads. Thanks to clarify&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Page 6: Standard capacities: Automatic provisioning per the storage service level by using APIs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Page 9: Configuring new workloads for using storage service levels (SSLs) and service level objective-based (SLO-based) APIs involves enabling the SLO advanced license&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;in my understanding "configuring new workload" means "provisioning new workload" but maybe I am worng&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your patience&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Lots-of-question-about-Service-Level-Manager/m-p/134636#M24436</guid>
      <dc:creator>christig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

