<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic netapp-harvest: support for ontap 9.2 and 9.3? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/netapp-harvest-support-for-ontap-9-2-and-9-3/m-p/135474#M24556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is someone working on getting support for ontap 9.2 and 9.3 to netapp-harvest?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it would be nice to get a better suport then just reusing the templates from 9.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RONNIEMBENGTSEN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:27:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>netapp-harvest: support for ontap 9.2 and 9.3?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/netapp-harvest-support-for-ontap-9-2-and-9-3/m-p/135474#M24556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is someone working on getting support for ontap 9.2 and 9.3 to netapp-harvest?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it would be nice to get a better suport then just reusing the templates from 9.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/netapp-harvest-support-for-ontap-9-2-and-9-3/m-p/135474#M24556</guid>
      <dc:creator>RONNIEMBENGTSEN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: netapp-harvest: support for ontap 9.2 and 9.3?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/netapp-harvest-support-for-ontap-9-2-and-9-3/m-p/135523#M24563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I hesitate before continuing with my reply to your post.&amp;nbsp; I don't want to sound preachy or judgemental.&amp;nbsp; Your post touches on a topic about which I feel rather strongly in regards to "community support" tools and software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With respect to your desire (and it is one I sort of share), the expectations for Harvest are very clear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Harvest is a "Community Support" tool - meaning that it pretty much falls to the community or to Chris Madden of NetApp to make such changes.&amp;nbsp; [ Chris - I don't know if updated version support falls to you personally or if you have a/an formal/informagl group that helps you. ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using Harvest we all accept that this is the level of support we can expect - questions, fixes, new versions, etc. are disussed here only.&amp;nbsp; Updated releases of the tool will not necessarily track any particular NetApp standard product release, not that they are generally far behind.&amp;nbsp; Because of the work Chris did in creating the tool, if anyone has a particular need we can add that in ourselves until a more formal template is available.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the formal template doesn't even cover exactly what any customer needs.&amp;nbsp; Harvest as a framework is seriously well suited to anyone's specific custom need - a tribute to the work that went into creating it.&amp;nbsp; Given that Harvest is distributed fully as source code, we have complete freedom to make it meet our particular needs at anytime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a similar personal example with the author of Grafana in trying to request a new capability in that tool.&amp;nbsp; The request is that the source datastore associated with a dashboard panel template should itself be templated.&amp;nbsp; Right now the definition of the template requires an explicit datasource to populate the template selections.&amp;nbsp; Seems obvious for a particular use case I have.&amp;nbsp; However after a lot of discussion with the author Torkel, he didn't see or agree with&amp;nbsp;the need, so the request didn't get implemented..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still could do it myself if I really wanted it, and maintain it.&amp;nbsp; The key is I understand the level of support I can expect - maybe something I want gets done in the time I want it done, but I can never depend on it explicitly.&amp;nbsp; Such is the contract we have with authors and maintainers of community support software.&amp;nbsp; To have these tools&amp;nbsp;available, and at such quality,&amp;nbsp;is way more important, in my opinion, than any nits regarding some basic support issues.&amp;nbsp; We know there is momentum and that this will be forthcoming.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And on the day when it is no longer forthcoming, we accept that too as part of the deal we made to use the tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok.&amp;nbsp; I should probably get off my soap box now.&amp;nbsp; I hope everyone will accept this reply in the spirit in which I intend it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob Greenwald&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senior System Enginer | cStor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NCIE SAN ONTAP, Data Protection&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/netapp-harvest-support-for-ontap-9-2-and-9-3/m-p/135523#M24563</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobshouseofcards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-24T13:16:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

