<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetApp Filer in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/NetApp-Filer/m-p/136110#M24819</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Performance troubleshooting is a common query, but it's a multi-step process to triage what is wrong. In short, no, it shouldn't take 8 minutes to copy 390MB to a NetApp filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To start with, what version of ONTAP is this filer running, and what model and is it running in Clustered ONTAP, or classic 7-mode ONTAP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What disk configuration is present? What size, how many and what are the aggregate layouts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From this information we can give some pointers on options.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 01:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-21T01:43:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetApp Filer</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/NetApp-Filer/m-p/136071#M24818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder our network or netapp filer seems to have very low perfomance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For some software publisher I was asked if I could try some tar operation to check our system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However the operation took about 8min while using netapp filer. However when I do same operation on local /tmp the operatien takes 10s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of files in workarea=4000 and size is 390MB,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cd /path/to/workarea cd ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time tar cf workarea.tar ./&amp;lt;workareadir&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;3.232u 13.710s 7:47.04 3.6%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0+0k 302304+772848io 0pf+0w du -hsc workarea.tar &amp;lt;workareadir&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;379M&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; workarea.tar mkdir nfs_test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mv workarea.tar nfs_test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time tar xf workarea.tar&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.611u 64.788s 17:32.43 6.6%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0+0k 772784+302304io 0pf+0w&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mkdir -p /tmp/localdisk_test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cd /tmp/localdisk_test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time /bin/cp workarea.tar /tmp/localdisk_test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0.000u 0.427s 0:00.43 97.6%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0+0k 0+772784io 0pf+0w&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time tar xf workarea.tar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.224u 10.427s 0:12.21 95.3%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0+0k 64+302304io 0pf+0w&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;time tar cf workarea2.tar ./&amp;lt;workareadir&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0.488u 2.238s 0:02.73 99.2%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0+0k 40+1546312io 0pf+0w&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if our filer is set up properly. Maybe do you have an idea if those differences are reasonalbe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The netapp filer was bought about 3y ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ingo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/NetApp-Filer/m-p/136071#M24818</guid>
      <dc:creator>blackchili</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:20:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp Filer</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/NetApp-Filer/m-p/136110#M24819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Performance troubleshooting is a common query, but it's a multi-step process to triage what is wrong. In short, no, it shouldn't take 8 minutes to copy 390MB to a NetApp filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To start with, what version of ONTAP is this filer running, and what model and is it running in Clustered ONTAP, or classic 7-mode ONTAP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What disk configuration is present? What size, how many and what are the aggregate layouts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From this information we can give some pointers on options.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 01:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/NetApp-Filer/m-p/136110#M24819</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-21T01:43:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

