<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OCI shows Storage Pools with Raw Capacity  smaller than than capacity in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140183#M25599</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we are running the latest patches. And no disks (SSD's) are mixed with the SAS drives.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I was wondering&amp;nbsp; -- could this be a case inwhich the "Capacity (GB)" column is reporting Storage Efficiency (dedupe, compression, compaction..)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 17:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tlsmooth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-11T17:07:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OCI 7.3.1 shows Storage Pools with Raw Capacity smaller than capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140181#M25597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OCI shows Storage Pools with Raw Capacity smaller than than capacity.&amp;nbsp; Why is this the case?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Screen shot attached.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140181#M25597</guid>
      <dc:creator>tlsmooth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:43:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI shows Storage Pools with Raw Capacity  smaller than than capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140182#M25598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't have expected that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you running current patches for your ONTAP data sources?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Those aggregates don't happen to contain a mix of backend and internal storage, do they?&amp;nbsp; (I'm not even sure there is a situation where that configuration would be allowed in ONTAP; been out of that specialty for a while.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 17:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140182#M25598</guid>
      <dc:creator>moechnig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-11T17:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OCI shows Storage Pools with Raw Capacity  smaller than than capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140183#M25599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we are running the latest patches. And no disks (SSD's) are mixed with the SAS drives.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I was wondering&amp;nbsp; -- could this be a case inwhich the "Capacity (GB)" column is reporting Storage Efficiency (dedupe, compression, compaction..)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 17:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/OCI-7-3-1-shows-Storage-Pools-with-Raw-Capacity-smaller-than-capacity/m-p/140183#M25599</guid>
      <dc:creator>tlsmooth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-11T17:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

