<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Kicking off Parallel Processes in WFA in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Kicking-off-Parallel-Processes-in-WFA/m-p/141145#M25792</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to have WFA launch a separate workflow or process that continues to run as a separate process while the original process continues to run?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, I have created a workflow to do a snapmirror failover for an application.&amp;nbsp; But, one application at this customer has over 40 large volumes associated with it.&amp;nbsp; Right now, it will run through the failover for one volume before continuing to the next.&amp;nbsp; Obviously, this ends up taking a long time to complete that way.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to get them all to kick off in parallel?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I thought that if I created a&amp;nbsp;main workflow that discovered all the volumes and then called a second workflow for each volume that each would kick off as a separate process, but it still completes each one before moving on to the next one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found this article from the WFAGuy, but it's pretty involved.&amp;nbsp; Seems like there might be an easier way that I'm missing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.wfaguy.com/2018/03/wfa-sub-workflow-runner-template.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.wfaguy.com/2018/03/wfa-sub-workflow-runner-template.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. - How many workflows can WFA 4.1 run simultaneously?&amp;nbsp; 4.2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jim_Robertson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:34:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kicking off Parallel Processes in WFA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Kicking-off-Parallel-Processes-in-WFA/m-p/141145#M25792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to have WFA launch a separate workflow or process that continues to run as a separate process while the original process continues to run?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, I have created a workflow to do a snapmirror failover for an application.&amp;nbsp; But, one application at this customer has over 40 large volumes associated with it.&amp;nbsp; Right now, it will run through the failover for one volume before continuing to the next.&amp;nbsp; Obviously, this ends up taking a long time to complete that way.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to get them all to kick off in parallel?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I thought that if I created a&amp;nbsp;main workflow that discovered all the volumes and then called a second workflow for each volume that each would kick off as a separate process, but it still completes each one before moving on to the next one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found this article from the WFAGuy, but it's pretty involved.&amp;nbsp; Seems like there might be an easier way that I'm missing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.wfaguy.com/2018/03/wfa-sub-workflow-runner-template.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.wfaguy.com/2018/03/wfa-sub-workflow-runner-template.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. - How many workflows can WFA 4.1 run simultaneously?&amp;nbsp; 4.2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Kicking-off-Parallel-Processes-in-WFA/m-p/141145#M25792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jim_Robertson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

