<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EMC Unity reporting compression in OCI? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-reporting-compression-in-OCI/m-p/142693#M26065</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For EMC Unity 300/400 models with compression enabled on storage pool - is OCI capable of reporting either;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- achieved compression in % of storage pool allocated&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- consumed volumes after compression&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gaute&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GauteA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:19:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EMC Unity reporting compression in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-reporting-compression-in-OCI/m-p/142693#M26065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For EMC Unity 300/400 models with compression enabled on storage pool - is OCI capable of reporting either;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- achieved compression in % of storage pool allocated&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- consumed volumes after compression&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gaute&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-reporting-compression-in-OCI/m-p/142693#M26065</guid>
      <dc:creator>GauteA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:19:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EMC Unity reporting compression in OCI?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-reporting-compression-in-OCI/m-p/142698#M26069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Gaute,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You didn't flag your post with the "Insight" label, so I didn't get an email notification about this post - a lot of the OCI people are only "following" the Insight label&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;OCI is going to run&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"C:\Program Files (x86)\EMC\Unisphere CLI\uemcli.exe" -d unity.hostname.goes.here -u OCI -p OCIisSweet! -sslPolicy accept /stor/config/pool&amp;nbsp; show -detail&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And report for each storage pool what the compression savings are&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;OCI is not reporting per individual volume compression savings - generally speaking, traditional storage arrays' per volume compression features have not been adopted by users, and OCI doesn't report per volume compression as a result. Most all flash arrays have pervasive, always on compression, and OCI tends to capture those arrays' compression at the storage pool level.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/EMC-Unity-reporting-compression-in-OCI/m-p/142698#M26069</guid>
      <dc:creator>ostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T15:02:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

