<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146976#M26746</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions, we deploy the unified mangers&amp;nbsp; accross the globe to allign with cdot filers located at these data centers. So yes, a federatated approach would be what we are looking for. Single entry point to find filer capacity and performance statistics unrelated to location of the storage devices.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently we try to stay within the max node count per OCUM, so roughly 75. with 140 cDot filers that resulted in 12 installations to date.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As to the archiving, goal is to get all netapp filer capacity and performanced data into our splunk metrics datastore.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Users then can create their own dashboards using netapp metrics but also other metrics already in splunk today,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;also, thanks for the link to the oum schemas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 20:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-07T20:21:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146625#M26666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Upgrading form unified manager 7.3 to 9.5, noticed that the overview dashboard no longer holds '&lt;SPAN&gt;Unresolved Incidents and Risks' panels. I found these panels to be very useful. What was the reason for this change?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146625#M26666</guid>
      <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:49:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146734#M26678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;anyone from netapp perhaps to comment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146734#M26678</guid>
      <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-21T19:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146742#M26680</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We already have consolidated events grid that brings in health, capacity, protection and performance in the same window which can be sorted based on how you want to see it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The idea is to save on the real-estate and provide more informaiton on protection and performance that may help you with your infrastructure. For example, you get real-time information for Synchronous Snapmirror under protection widget in the dashboard. There are many value adds like this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dhiman&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146742#M26680</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-22T06:43:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146837#M26708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reply. Personally i still prefer the previous layout.&amp;nbsp; Easier to view risks&amp;nbsp; on one scrollable page, now there is more of selecting going on.&amp;nbsp; Also lot's of white space on the new overview page.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146837#M26708</guid>
      <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-27T19:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146936#M26734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With 12 production unified managers we are at a point to extract and move to a single database (using open database)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;via the database connection was able to locat the capacity tables but having problems getting to volume latency/iops/MBps metrics. What table and catalog would we have to query?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;basically we would like to recreate what OCUM shows under the volume perf section, but single view accross all ocum instances.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 23:35:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146936#M26734</guid>
      <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-05T23:35:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146965#M26742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is interesting but I am not sure I understand your proposal. Help me understand your query by ansering the following questions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Are all the instance in the same site?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;If yes --&amp;gt; What is the node count across the datacenter?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Are all the instances in differrent locations?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; If yes --&amp;gt; are you looking for federation?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most importantly would like to understand what you are trying to achieve, this is not a normal data pull request from your query, you are pulling all the information and aggregating to another DB, another MySQL DB? Are you defining new schema in the new DB?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For understanding performance schema and how it needs to be used, please follow the TR-4709:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4709.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4709.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dhiman&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146965#M26742</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhiman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-07T09:50:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unified Manager 9.5 - Dashboard overview</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146976#M26746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions, we deploy the unified mangers&amp;nbsp; accross the globe to allign with cdot filers located at these data centers. So yes, a federatated approach would be what we are looking for. Single entry point to find filer capacity and performance statistics unrelated to location of the storage devices.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently we try to stay within the max node count per OCUM, so roughly 75. with 140 cDot filers that resulted in 12 installations to date.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As to the archiving, goal is to get all netapp filer capacity and performanced data into our splunk metrics datastore.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Users then can create their own dashboards using netapp metrics but also other metrics already in splunk today,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;also, thanks for the link to the oum schemas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 20:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Unified-Manager-9-5-Dashboard-overview/m-p/146976#M26746</guid>
      <dc:creator>gberger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-07T20:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

