<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: System manager 2.0R1 not following Netapp recommendation on MetroCluster Aggregates in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/System-manager-2-0R1-not-following-Netapp-recommendation-on-MetroCluster/m-p/13315#M2716</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have not gotten an answer, you may want to ask this question in the &lt;A href="https://forums.netapp.com/community/support" target="_blank"&gt;NetApp Support Community.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; The current customers, partners and internal Subject Matter Experts are addressing technical product questions there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>crocker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-08T17:31:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>System manager 2.0R1 not following Netapp recommendation on MetroCluster Aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/System-manager-2-0R1-not-following-Netapp-recommendation-on-MetroCluster/m-p/13311#M2715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just created my first 64-bit aggregate with System Manager 2.0R1 on our Ontap 8.0.1 system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It failed partialy, among things it said was that it could not set snap schedule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, it did succeed but Ontap CLI immediatly complained that it is not recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ended up with a 64-bit aggregate, with a default aggregate snap schedule set, aggregate option nosnap=off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I researched some and found following Netapp KB and followed it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2011977" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2011977" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=2011977&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I didn't set the aggregate nosnap option so Ontap continued complaining despite setting the "off schedule"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more thing I noticed is that system manager didn't seem to take care of how many spares would be left after creating the aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I came to the last "continue" wizard page and there I stopped as I didn't have time to test if the last click would bring out any kind of warning/error about not having any spares left after creating the aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Ontap (long missing) dissability to remove disks from an aggregate I view the spare question as very serious as it might not be noticed until too late when the aggregate already is in production.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And there seems to be some serious bug related to aggregate snapshots on syncmirrored aggregates:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=162634" title="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=162634" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=162634&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then again, it might have given an error at the last step when trying to create the aggregate.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/System-manager-2-0R1-not-following-Netapp-recommendation-on-MetroCluster/m-p/13311#M2715</guid>
      <dc:creator>dejanliuit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:35:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: System manager 2.0R1 not following Netapp recommendation on MetroCluster Aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/System-manager-2-0R1-not-following-Netapp-recommendation-on-MetroCluster/m-p/13315#M2716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have not gotten an answer, you may want to ask this question in the &lt;A href="https://forums.netapp.com/community/support" target="_blank"&gt;NetApp Support Community.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; The current customers, partners and internal Subject Matter Experts are addressing technical product questions there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/System-manager-2-0R1-not-following-Netapp-recommendation-on-MetroCluster/m-p/13315#M2716</guid>
      <dc:creator>crocker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-08T17:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

