<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Grafana filter volumes by aggregate in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164979#M28178</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's a good question and one of the limitations of the current time series backend (Graphite).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should get easier with Harvest 2.0 as it has better options to tag data instead of relying on a folder hierarchy like Graphite does today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/69349"&gt;@vachagan_gratian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;would you keep that in mind or do you have any thoughts ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yannb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-16T08:30:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Grafana filter volumes by aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164930#M28169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have started using Grafana and I found couple of aggregates with busy disks. I was trying to find the busiest volumes in the aggregate. There are more than 200 Volumes on that aggregate and going through them one by one is a pain. Is there a way to find them using Grafana? There was a discussion on the simmilar topic in 2018. Was wondering if this functionality is included in the latest version of NABox.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Infrastructure-Management-Software-Discussions/Grafana-volumes-by-node/td-p/139653" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Infrastructure-Management-Software-Discussions/Grafana-volumes-by-node/td-p/139653&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164930#M28169</guid>
      <dc:creator>swordfish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:31:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Grafana filter volumes by aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164969#M28176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I do not know the exact answer for your question. NAbox 2.6.3 does not seem to have what you are looking for (at least I have not found).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alternatively, you could use AIQUM (if supported by your environment). It would do the job that you need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pedro&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164969#M28176</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-15T19:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Grafana filter volumes by aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164979#M28178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's a good question and one of the limitations of the current time series backend (Graphite).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should get easier with Harvest 2.0 as it has better options to tag data instead of relying on a folder hierarchy like Graphite does today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/69349"&gt;@vachagan_gratian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;would you keep that in mind or do you have any thoughts ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Grafana-filter-volumes-by-aggregate/m-p/164979#M28178</guid>
      <dc:creator>yannb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-16T08:30:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

