<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Workflow Automation Commandlet  - Returning a varaiable in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Workflow-Automation-Commandlet-Returning-a-varaiable/m-p/165544#M28193</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a commandlet that returns a variable back to a workflow without use of the addWfaWorkflowParameter?&amp;nbsp; I ask because I would like to be able to pass the returned data as a parameter to either a filter or a subordinate workflow.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>t_johnk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:28:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Workflow Automation Commandlet  - Returning a varaiable</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Workflow-Automation-Commandlet-Returning-a-varaiable/m-p/165544#M28193</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a commandlet that returns a variable back to a workflow without use of the addWfaWorkflowParameter?&amp;nbsp; I ask because I would like to be able to pass the returned data as a parameter to either a filter or a subordinate workflow.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Workflow-Automation-Commandlet-Returning-a-varaiable/m-p/165544#M28193</guid>
      <dc:creator>t_johnk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:28:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

