<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170191#M28295</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One thing that you can consider too is there is a bit of headroom in the CPU failover with increased latencies up to about 70%/70%. It's pretty hard to keep it right at 50/50 (or some split totaling 100%) all the time, so you do have a bit extra to use. There are some background processes that run but given the combined CPU space onto a single node, if they run at all during failover, they get even less execution time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a good ground rule that you can use in addition to the failover planning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-22T20:27:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170103#M28290</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello people&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i was wondering after a customer sent a doubt to me, if AIQUM is able to simulate and measure the impact of CPU/IOPs that can handle one of the HApair in case of failure of the partner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like something exactly or pretty similar to this that exstsed in OCPM (Perfomance Mgr) long time ago where you can assess this behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see this to compare &amp;amp; respond to me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42o4BOiajg0&amp;amp;list=PLdXI3bZJEw7mp3jFSg0IJgo3oeDQRY-Gl&amp;amp;index=21" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42o4BOiajg0&amp;amp;list=PLdXI3bZJEw7mp3jFSg0IJgo3oeDQRY-Gl&amp;amp;index=21&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170103#M28290</guid>
      <dc:creator>JavierBarea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:13:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170105#M28291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Short answer: Yes it does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a screenshot from current AIQUM 9.9 (also existed in earlier versions).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see there is a tab called "Failover Planning" covering exactly this use case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="FailoverPlanning.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12041iA0D400171C6E5B54/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="FailoverPlanning.png" alt="FailoverPlanning.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To get there go to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inventory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Storage&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Nodes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under "View" select "Performance - All Nodes" - click on the node of interest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards, Niels&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170105#M28291</guid>
      <dc:creator>niels</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T15:07:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170107#M28292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thx for the quick answer Niels,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;perfect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BestRegards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:59:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170107#M28292</guid>
      <dc:creator>JavierBarea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T15:59:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170191#M28295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One thing that you can consider too is there is a bit of headroom in the CPU failover with increased latencies up to about 70%/70%. It's pretty hard to keep it right at 50/50 (or some split totaling 100%) all the time, so you do have a bit extra to use. There are some background processes that run but given the combined CPU space onto a single node, if they run at all during failover, they get even less execution time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a good ground rule that you can use in addition to the failover planning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170191#M28295</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-22T20:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to simulate and measure the perfomance impact of a node-ctl failure within an HA in AIQUM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170198#M28296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Appreciated The feedback&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:01:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/How-to-simulate-and-measure-the-perfomance-impact-of-a-node-ctl-failure-within/m-p/170198#M28296</guid>
      <dc:creator>JavierBarea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T07:01:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

