<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AIQUM long term support for legacy StorageServices API in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447367#M28510</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BobG,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The support issue with CommVault and AIQUM 9.11+ has been resolved, and CommVault should be supporting those versions if you have patched them. Please open a NetApp Support case if you need those patches and reference the below KB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_9.11__and_9.12_and_9.13_shows__backup_location_update_issue_with_Commvault_aux_copy_jobs" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;AIQUM 9.11 and 9.12 and 9.13 shows backup location update issue with Commvault aux copy jobs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Those StorageService APIs are still supported, but we don't really recommend calling them outside of a third party backup product like CommVault due to complexity. Historically, they're only used by themselves by Support to resolve some specific issues, which is probably why there's not a lot of documentation. It's meant to be behind the curtain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As to your question, I don't know for sure that those specifically are scheduled to be converted to REST, but I do know we have plans to convert all of AIQUM's ZAPIs to REST, and that this is still in progress. I also have not heard that Support for CommVault was getting dropped, so I would tend to think they will be converted at some future date.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dawnr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-31T19:09:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AIQUM long term support for legacy StorageServices API</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447333#M28508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Apologies in advance - the terminology herein gets confusing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OCUM (and possibly DFM before that) had a concept of a "Storage Service" internally.&amp;nbsp; With APIs you could define a "topology" consisting of ONTAP nodes, and then clusters and SVMs as primary, secondary, tertiary with named storage pools on each.&amp;nbsp; A pool would be a list of aggregates.&amp;nbsp; Once a topology was defined, you could define a "storage service policy" which would define how volumes would replicate from a primary to the indicated storage pools on the downstream nodes.&amp;nbsp; Could be fan out, different numbers of copies/retentions on each, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A storage service policy could then be used with a bunch of volumes to create a "storage service" - that is all the volumes assigned to the service would get the replication pattern assigned to the service based on the policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From that point, a single API call - "conform" - would take the original primary volumes, figure out what snapmirrors were needed and automatically create the snapmirrors to the target storage systems somewhere in the defined storage pools.&amp;nbsp; If the topology pattern was ever updated, the "conform" call would create the snapmirrors needed to adjust the policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, another single call - "protection update" - would initiate all the snapmirror updates through the entire topology.&amp;nbsp; Individual snapshots transferred as part of this topology could be uniquely tracked (and queried) for where they were for recovery purposes.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This particular API set had little, to my knowledge, actual documentation.&amp;nbsp; The only reference I ever found was a TR (I think) related to OCUM 6.x APIs way back in the day, and I've never seen it updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This entire API set was targeted, so far as I know, to backup system vendors to automate through a single interface all the ONTAP operations needed to use snapshots as protection mechanisms.&amp;nbsp; Reference the discussion threads on CommVault and AIQUM/OCUM operational compatibility and why CommVault is not supporting AIQUM 9.11+ right now.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;(Ref BURT 1549150).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[ Side note - I'd suggest anyone new starting with CV to manage snapshot backups on ONTAP seriously look at "OpenReplication" instead of AIQUM integration - especially due to the point of this post to come next. ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which bring me to the question... the REST API documentation makes no reference to StorageServices as had been provided in OCUM/AIQUM previously.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Are the old StorageServices dead as a concept?&amp;nbsp; Is there no intent to bring them forward into the REST API?&amp;nbsp; If they are brought forward, will there be documentation to support them at some point?&amp;nbsp; Or will the old documentation and traditional AIQUM API calls be required to use them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To be clear - "StorageServices" are not Performance Service Levels as defined in SystemManager and AIQUM today.&amp;nbsp; Performance Service Levels are the integration of what NSLM started off as being (NetApp Service Level Manager) before it was absorbed into AIQUM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for anyone who has good info on this topic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob Greenwald&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447333#M28508</guid>
      <dc:creator>BobG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T09:45:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIQUM long term support for legacy StorageServices API</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447362#M28509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For reference - found again the developer's guide describing the capabilities above...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1416663" target="_blank"&gt;OnCommand® Unified Manager 6.1 API Developer's Guide (netapp.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To my knowledge as indicated it has never been updated past OCUM 6.1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447362#M28509</guid>
      <dc:creator>BobG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T16:56:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AIQUM long term support for legacy StorageServices API</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447367#M28510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BobG,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The support issue with CommVault and AIQUM 9.11+ has been resolved, and CommVault should be supporting those versions if you have patched them. Please open a NetApp Support case if you need those patches and reference the below KB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_9.11__and_9.12_and_9.13_shows__backup_location_update_issue_with_Commvault_aux_copy_jobs" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;AIQUM 9.11 and 9.12 and 9.13 shows backup location update issue with Commvault aux copy jobs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Those StorageService APIs are still supported, but we don't really recommend calling them outside of a third party backup product like CommVault due to complexity. Historically, they're only used by themselves by Support to resolve some specific issues, which is probably why there's not a lot of documentation. It's meant to be behind the curtain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As to your question, I don't know for sure that those specifically are scheduled to be converted to REST, but I do know we have plans to convert all of AIQUM's ZAPIs to REST, and that this is still in progress. I also have not heard that Support for CommVault was getting dropped, so I would tend to think they will be converted at some future date.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/AIQUM-long-term-support-for-legacy-StorageServices-API/m-p/447367#M28510</guid>
      <dc:creator>dawnr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T19:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

