<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Host Package on external client in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16619#M3363</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes, because they are still competing actions that are possible by VSC and HP. I am filing a bug for the same to get it updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-23T03:58:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16586#M3357</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry if this is a noob question, but I´ve read through the documents and couldn´t quit find the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer with vSphere 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They want to connect to our filer now but after some initial tests the VMware admin thought that the NetApp applications used a lot of memory on the client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So they want to install the hostpackage on an external client instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I have two questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. What ports should be opened in what direction? There should be both to the ESX/vSphere klient and to our Management server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Is both the Host Package and VSC to be installed on the external klient or shoudl the VSC still be isntalled on te ESX/vSphere klient?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry if this is a noob question, but I´m new to this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16586#M3357</guid>
      <dc:creator>connoisseur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:40:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16591#M3358</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;just tp bring some ativity into this community: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regarding your second question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- VSC and Host Package are completely independent products so you can install them on different servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- however if you do so you are loosing the ability to configure a local shared "lock" folder, preventing a deadlock situation between VSC and Host Package: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - you might be able to setup a shared lock directory on a network share though&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Installation Guide: (page 51)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you plan to install OnCommand Host Package on the same system as Virtual Storage Console&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.1.1, a best practice is to setup a shared lock directory. A shared lock directory is used for products&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that share resources through the vSphere client. This ensures that mutually exclusive functions do not&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;happen in parallel. For example, cloning of a virtual machine through Virtual Storage Console at&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;same time that OnCommand Host Package is attempting to restore the same virtual machine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope that helps partially...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16591#M3358</guid>
      <dc:creator>chott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-19T08:21:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16600#M3359</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Chris.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I sort of forgott this topic &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16600#M3359</guid>
      <dc:creator>connoisseur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-19T08:25:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16605#M3360</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the same recommendation (to use a shares lock dir between VSC and Host Package) still there for VSC 4.0 / 4.1 and Host Package 1.2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because the HS setup guide explicitly states VSC version 2.1.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16605#M3360</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark_schuren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-22T12:37:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16610#M3361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;couldn't think of a reason why it should not be required any more, so yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The documentation has probably just not been updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16610#M3361</guid>
      <dc:creator>chott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-22T12:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16614#M3362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for confirmation, Chris. Always did it but was not sure if still required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16614#M3362</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark_schuren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-22T15:29:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16619#M3363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes, because they are still competing actions that are possible by VSC and HP. I am filing a bug for the same to get it updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16619#M3363</guid>
      <dc:creator>adaikkap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-23T03:58:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Package on external client</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16622#M3364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great, thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Von: Adaikkappan Arumugam &lt;A href="mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Februar 2013 04:59&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An: Mark Schuren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Betreff: &lt;A href="OnCommand Management Software" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt; - Re: Host Package on external client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="NetApp Online Community" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;A href="https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa&amp;gt;" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Re: Host Package on external client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;created by Adaikkappan Arumugam&amp;lt;&lt;A href="https://communities.netapp.com/people/adaikkap&amp;gt;" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/people/adaikkap&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt; in OnCommand Management Software - View the full discussion&amp;lt;&lt;A href="https://communities.netapp.com/message/101130#101130&amp;gt;" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/message/101130#101130&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     Yes, because they are still competing actions that are possible by VSC and HP. I am filing a bug for the same to get it updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;adai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community&amp;lt;&lt;A href="https://communities.netapp.com/message/101130#101130&amp;gt;" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/message/101130#101130&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Start a new discussion in OnCommand Management Software by email&amp;lt;mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-storage_management_software@communities.netapp.com&amp;gt; or at NetApp Community&amp;lt;&lt;A href="https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&amp;amp;containerType=14&amp;amp;container=2026&amp;gt;" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&amp;amp;containerType=14&amp;amp;container=2026&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Host-Package-on-external-client/m-p/16622#M3364</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark_schuren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T08:28:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

