<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule&amp;quot; and escape for previous alarms? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/185#M38</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are still running a OCUM5.1, yes update follow in the next days, but what am I seeking for is a solution for a problem which I think should be quite simple, but I didnt get it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have several Alarm, like "full volume", "*_latency",.... and so on, followed by some sort of "hit-all-the-rest-alarm". the intention is, the dedicated alarms should be mailed to some group of people, but the "hit-the-unspecific"-rule to another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is this "hit-the-unspecific"-Rule, simply: "Event: ALL; Severity: Error or worse; Group: global", now we are getting all alarms twice, the specific and the unspecific, cause the severity hits, I understand why that happens, BUT, is there any solution to get around that, or a escape-rule would be nice....if a specific alarm was triggered no other alarm is engaged.... or is the only solution to define alarms for every Event-Type to route that mailing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could work with groups, but the global-group would hit always...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:40:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mgruber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:40:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule" and escape for previous alarms?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/185#M38</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are still running a OCUM5.1, yes update follow in the next days, but what am I seeking for is a solution for a problem which I think should be quite simple, but I didnt get it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have several Alarm, like "full volume", "*_latency",.... and so on, followed by some sort of "hit-all-the-rest-alarm". the intention is, the dedicated alarms should be mailed to some group of people, but the "hit-the-unspecific"-rule to another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is this "hit-the-unspecific"-Rule, simply: "Event: ALL; Severity: Error or worse; Group: global", now we are getting all alarms twice, the specific and the unspecific, cause the severity hits, I understand why that happens, BUT, is there any solution to get around that, or a escape-rule would be nice....if a specific alarm was triggered no other alarm is engaged.... or is the only solution to define alarms for every Event-Type to route that mailing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could work with groups, but the global-group would hit always...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:40:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/185#M38</guid>
      <dc:creator>mgruber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:40:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule" and escape for previous alarms?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/190#M39</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Gruber,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; AFAIK, once you create an Alarm with "Event: ALL; Severity: Error or worse; Group: global", there is no way to exclude specific alarms form that list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; You could create separate alarms for every event-type to route the mailing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Arun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 02:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/190#M39</guid>
      <dc:creator>arunchak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-21T02:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule" and escape for previous alarms?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/199#M40</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, that is what I nearly expected, I had a small hope, that I have missed something or there is some sort of "hidden trick" &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/quot-Hit-All-the-unspecific-Alarm-Rule-quot-and-escape-for-previous-alarms/m-p/199#M40</guid>
      <dc:creator>mgruber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-21T07:07:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

