<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple dfpm_base snapshots on primary volume in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19060#M4105</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Amirm,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apologize for not having replied earlier.&amp;nbsp; The protection manager system seems have to corrected the issue of two dfm_base snapshots on the primary volume.&amp;nbsp; It looks as though there was a considerable amount of lag in the snapvault transfer from the primary to the secondary which was causing two dfm_base snaphosts to exist on the primary volume.&amp;nbsp; The older dfm_base snapshot was removed once the snapvault transfer completed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kenny H&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kennyah2007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T17:34:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple dfpm_base snapshots on primary volume</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19050#M4100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have several primary volumes which contain more then on dfpm_base snapshot.&amp;nbsp; Following is output from the "snap list" command on the primary volume which shows two dfm_base snapshot.&amp;nbsp; One dfm_base snapshot is current and the other is three days old:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tomcat # ssh fsxxxx snap list projxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Volume projxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;working...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; %/used&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; %/total&amp;nbsp; date&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------&amp;nbsp; ----------&amp;nbsp; ------------&amp;nbsp; --------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 3%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2% ( 2%)&amp;nbsp; May 07 09:15&amp;nbsp; 2012-05-07_0915-0500_hourly_proj12000s_06 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 3% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; May 07 08:15&amp;nbsp; 2012-05-07_0815-0500_hourly_proj12000s_06 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 6% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4% ( 0%)&amp;nbsp; May 06 12:21&amp;nbsp; dfpm_base(proj12000s_06.53009)conn1.0 (busy,snapvault)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 25% ( 6%)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 17% ( 4%)&amp;nbsp; May 03 16:31&amp;nbsp; dfpm_base(proj12000s_06.53009)conn1.1 (busy,snapvault)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please advice me on how we can clear up this issue with multiple dfm_base snapshots.&amp;nbsp; We are using protection manger running under oncommand 5..0.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kenny H&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19050#M4100</guid>
      <dc:creator>kennyah2007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple dfpm_base snapshots on primary volume</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19055#M4102</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kenny,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the retention level specified in the policy? To get more details could you please run following commands and provide the output:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;On the DFM server:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;dfpm dataset list -x &amp;lt;Name_of_the_dataset_where_you_are_having_problems&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;dfpm policy node get "&amp;lt;Name_of_the_protection_policy_associated_to_the_Dataset&amp;gt;" and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;DFM diag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;dfpm backup list &amp;lt;dataset_name_or_id&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;And on the controller run:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;snap list &amp;lt;The_primary_Volume_where_PM_Snapshots_are_not_getting_Deleted&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-family: inherit;"&gt;-Amir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19055#M4102</guid>
      <dc:creator>amirm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-07T17:38:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple dfpm_base snapshots on primary volume</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19060#M4105</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Amirm,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apologize for not having replied earlier.&amp;nbsp; The protection manager system seems have to corrected the issue of two dfm_base snapshots on the primary volume.&amp;nbsp; It looks as though there was a considerable amount of lag in the snapvault transfer from the primary to the secondary which was causing two dfm_base snaphosts to exist on the primary volume.&amp;nbsp; The older dfm_base snapshot was removed once the snapvault transfer completed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kenny H&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Multiple-dfpm-base-snapshots-on-primary-volume/m-p/19060#M4105</guid>
      <dc:creator>kennyah2007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-09T17:34:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

