<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it a bad idea to try to install WFA 2.0 on a OCUM server? in Active IQ Unified Manager Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24263#M5163</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For lab testing and development, I have made it work with no issues.&amp;nbsp; We advise customers to keep them separated but for the use case that you have provided... it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeremy Goodrum, NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pirate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Twitter: @virtpirate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>goodrum</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-14T22:49:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it a bad idea to try to install WFA 2.0 on a OCUM server?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24258#M5161</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even it is not recommended or a best practice, is it possible for training purposes to install WFA 2.0 on the same Windows server running OCUM 5.1? Or is that just asking for big troubles? I don't care about performance or scalability; just to get hands on training.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24258#M5161</guid>
      <dc:creator>korns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:13:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it a bad idea to try to install WFA 2.0 on a OCUM server?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24263#M5163</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For lab testing and development, I have made it work with no issues.&amp;nbsp; We advise customers to keep them separated but for the use case that you have provided... it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeremy Goodrum, NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pirate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Twitter: @virtpirate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24263#M5163</guid>
      <dc:creator>goodrum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-14T22:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it a bad idea to try to install WFA 2.0 on a OCUM server?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24272#M5166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, its not recommended to have WFA and OnCommand on same machine. But, for demo or training you can have WFA and OC on same machine. Make sure that you do not change default http/https ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-Discussions/Is-it-a-bad-idea-to-try-to-install-WFA-2-0-on-a-OCUM-server/m-p/24272#M5166</guid>
      <dc:creator>girirp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-17T13:57:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

